The domestic law and practice concerning Law no. 89 of 24 March 2001, known as the “Pinto Act”, are set out in the Cocchiarella v.

They are represented before the Court by Mr Mustafa Ayzit, a lawyer practising in Istanbul.

of the law or the development of the law through case-law...

The applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court ( Hoge Raad ).

In March 2016 the Prosecutor’s Office in St   Petersburg established that the bailiff had failed to act in a timely manner and to take all the measures provided for by the law to secure the enforcement

Hayrapetyan, lawyers practising in Yerevan.

    Relevant domestic law and practice 13.

  68 ‑ FZ of 30 April 2010, “On Compensation for Violation of the Right to a Trial within a Reasonable Time or the Right to Enforcement of a Judgment within a Reasonable Time), a person is

At the material time, the applicant’s legal guardian was a social worker.

law.

It is time to cut out those organs suffering from necrosis. ...”

    At the time of the events described below, the second applicant was a judge at the Shtip Court of Appeal and her son worked for a law firm. 17 .

        By letter of 11 July 1986 the applicant's lawyer sent a written authority signed by the applicant to the Registrar of the Regional Court, authorising the latter to

It informed the applicant that replacement of the lawyer had taken place at his request, that lawyer O.

His request was examined and granted only six months later. The applicant instituted civil proceedings against the State, seeking compensation for the damage sustained by judicial malpractice.

    RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND OTHER NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS 13.

It had also not been correct to find that they could not complain about the latter because they had failed to do so under Section 6 (2) of the Ordinance, since the latter did not provide that the time

During the year, the Chinese Government continued its efforts to educate lawyers, judges, prosecutors, and especially the public on the provisions of this and other new laws.

For the reasons identified in the case law to which reference has already been made, I am satisfied that the Constitution does guarantee a right to a timely trial.

    Relevant domestic law 1.