You can also have regard to evidence about what was said by another person about the accused in his hearing and that is because he has an opportunity there and then to contradict what is being said about

with your clients bearing in mind that what I am saying they may not appreciate it but I do think it, what I am saying is in their interests as well, you know.

In particular, what was the available domestic remedy with respect to the applicant’s complaints related to the alleged impartiality of Justices G.B., M.S., Ó.B.Þ. and V.M.M.?

In particular, what was the available domestic remedy with respect to the applicant’s complaints related to the alleged impartiality of Justices E.T. and V.M.M.?

    In 1992 they moved from what is today the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Federation”) to what is today the Republika Srpska (each of the Federation and the Republika Srpska being

If so, when, and what rights was he informed about?

Who knows what he will invent when he is asked to give an explanation? Relatives from Căușeni?

(iii)     In what facility/to the premises of what authority was the applicant placed on the day of his arrest?

When asked whether the impugned article reflected what really went on in the court room, the prosecutor replied “effectively it reflects what happened in court in short”.

If yes, what was the applicable sub-paragraph of that provision?   3.

If not, what is the reason for that and what has been done to obtain travel documents?         [A1] ITMARKFactsComplaintsStart PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE

See also John Murray v. the United Kingdom , 8 February 1996, §§   64-65, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ I);   (b) what was the significance, if any, of the administration of

If so, on what date this mechanism became operational?

    What would have been the reimbursable amount of the lawyer’s fees in comparable ordinary civil proceedings at the relevant time and what would have been the amount in proceedings, such as

I said ‘What are these contracts?’

What were the specific consequences of the court decision 26   November 2008, in particular within six months after 19 May 2009?

What was the exact aim of the operation? What police department did the officers involved belong to? What was the exact information available to the authorities in respect of the applicant?

about what he is commenting on."

But even today, in a more enlightened age, what is involved in making a genuine complaint is not to be underestimated: in having to relive and to recount what had happened, firstly to a parent or stepparent

It was not known what was meant by “exceptional cases” or “extraordinary circumstances”.