CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 619 résultats pour « Isabel WERTER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0705DEC000989611

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2018

5 juillet 2018

The Court is satisfied that the domestic courts cited specific facts in support of their conclusions that the applicants were liable to obstruct justice, to re-offend or abscond.

Page 60 sur 131

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115DEC003372714

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2016

15 novembre 2016

They were represented before the Court by lawyers from the Stichting Russian Justice Initiative and Mr Sh. Isayev, a lawyer practising in Moscow.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0321DEC003271802

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2006

21 mars 2006

On the same day the applicants were served with an eviction order.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD002654008

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2013

19 décembre 2013

He confirmed that when he had woken up in the morning he and V. were naked (they had gone to bed clothed) and their boxer shorts were missing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD000447302

Admin. suprême

10 février 2011

10 février 2011

They were kept there from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and were not normally provided with access to a toilet.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0529JUD001408903

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2008

29 mai 2008

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   Y.   Zaytsev. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0618JUD003750004

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2009

18 juin 2009

However her efforts were to no avail. 20.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1013JUD001058309

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2011

13 octobre 2011

    The applicants were represented by Mr P. Zima, a lawyer practising in Prague. The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0602DEC001142218

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2022

2 juin 2022

Isayev, a lawyer practising in Krasnoyarsk.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212JUD004497104

Admin. suprême

12 février 2013

12 février 2013

The bags were loaded into the trailer by two people, Mr V.M. and Mr G.M. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC002282006

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

It was for the Court of Appeal to establish whether those conditions were fulfilled by the article published by the applicant company. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD001739106

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2014

12 juin 2014

As a result, one person was shot dead, five people were severely injured and several dozen people were beaten up or were injured by the shells of the tear-gas bombs which had exploded in the midst of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD001998606

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

Therefore, when he went to the school, everyone had already left.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326DEC001377611

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2013

26 mars 2013

According to him, the conditions of his detention were inadequate; the Government disputed that. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD000656605

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2008

18 décembre 2008

    The applicants were represented by Mr G. Avramenko, a lawyer practising in Chernigiv. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0609DEC005609412

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2015

9 juin 2015

    The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. A.     The circumstances of the case 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC002372803

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2009

24 mars 2009

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   Yuriy   Zaytsev. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD003531202

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2008

12 juin 2008

The proceedings were suspended. By September   1999 the applicant’s requests for a supervisory protest were rejected. 18.     In July   2000 the hearings resumed. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708DEC000055403

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

After both events criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208DEC003896107

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2009

8 décembre 2009

The parties were granted a time-limit until 30 May 2008 to make a statement on the settlement proposal, and until 1 July 2008 on other aspects.

Source officielle