CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326DEC008405217
26 mars 2019
As the Kúria pointed out (see paragraph 8 above), the subject matter of the labour cases was not the determination of the applicants’ guilt, but the assessment of their conduct in the perspective of labour
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0512DEC002243305
12 mai 2009
The Supreme Court noted in that regard that the Labour Code did not preclude employers and employees from replacing a permanent labour relation with that of a definite duration.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0414DEC001811791
14 avril 1994
       On 23 March 1982 the Stuttgart Labour Court (Arbeitsgericht) granted the action.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115DEC005313808
15 janvier 2013
On 29 January 2004 the Labour Court accepted most of the applicant’s claim, but failed to address the entirety of his claims.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010DEC007706213
10 octobre 2017
    X brought labour action against the applicant company, claiming unlawful dismissal. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0628DEC002377294
28 juin 1995
Nevertheless, the work performed was not to be considered as forced or compulsory labour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0719DEC000343567
19 juillet 1968
Again, slavery might not in any way involve forced labour but merely involve a state of ownership.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009JUD002664205
9 octobre 2007
    The text of Article 195 § 3 of the Labour Act of 2005 corresponds to the aforementioned Article 122 § 3 of the Labour Act of 2001. C.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1122DEC003979398
22 novembre 2001
In any event, the applicant had not specified which of his arguments the Regional Labour Court had failed to take into account. B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD006931912
21 mai 2015
    On 22 December 1998 the applicant instituted proceedings before the Kranj Divison of the Labour and Social Court. 10.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-95406
30 septembre 2009
Expert Medical Commission and the Central Labour Expert Medical Commission in 1998 to classify his disability status as first-degree (violation of Article 6§1).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206DEC002488304
6 décembre 2007
On 11 October 2001 the Labour Market Service dismissed his request.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6226
The Labour Court found the dismissal to be unjustified. The Higher Labour Court reversed the judgment, and deemed the applicant to be unsuited to continue teaching.
ECLI:CEDH:002-6095
29 février 2000
The applicant lodged an appeal with the Madrid Labour Court (no. 10); that appeal was dismissed, whereas Madrid Labour Court (no. 34) set aside the penalty imposed on L.C.M.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14525
16 octobre 2025
  1: The applicants had been entitled, under the provisions of labour legislation, to obtain salary and various other payments to be paid by their employer, a State entity, upon dismissal.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-147727
6 octobre 2014
In the early morning hours of 6 October 2002 she had the first signs of labour. At 7 a.m. she was taken to the labour room. At 8   a.m. the foetal heartbeat monitoring equipment broke down.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3763
26 juillet 2005
France - 73316/01 Judgment 26.7.2005 [Section II] Article 4 Article 4-1 Servitude Article 4-2 Forced labour Foreign minor without residence papers placed against her will into a situation of dependence
ECLI:CEDH:001-218005
25 mai 2022
The applicant challenged that decision before the Labour and Social Court in Ljubljana.
PPP Référés
65b2b0c9fd6229a4e589ba39
19 janvier 2024
SCI/FH PPP Référés N° RG 23/01961 - N° Portalis DBX6-W-B7H-YM6N [G] [S] [D] [P] [B] épouse [R], [C] [G] [A] [O] [R] C/ [E] [F], [T] [F] - Expéditions délivrées à Me Sylvie LABEYRIE
CH 2 JU
DTA_2302769_20250710
10 juillet 2025
des élevages de lapins de chair, de lapins de garenne et de lièvres ; - la liste des éventuels élevages de belettes, de chiens viverrins, de fouines, d'hermines, de martres, de putois, de ratons laveurs
Page 60 sur 493
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.