LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par : 1°/ Madame Y...

    On 12 October 2011, following an appeal, the case file, which consisted of six volumes and ten audio and video cassettes, was submitted to the Lisbon Court of Appeal. 9 .

In the circumstances of the present case – a classic case of defamation of an individual in the context of a debate on a matter of legitimate public interest – there had been no justification for the imposition

The mere fact that this had been allowed under domestic law had no bearing on the assessment for the purposes of Article   3.

Jadrijević Mladar; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

  APPENDIX List of cases:   No. Application no.

The Government thus considered, citing the Court’s case-law in De Parias Merry v.

The request for a public, oral (main) hearing in this double case, concerning on the one hand the request for the appointment of an administrator and on the other the immediate dismissal of certain care

représentée par la SCP BOYER-LESCAT-MERLE CONFIRMATION PARTIELLE Grosse délivrée le àREPUBLIQUE FRANCAISE AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

In an initial investigation of the case, the Investigating Judge had closed the proceedings because it had not been possible to identify the perpetrator(s).

        The case came back before the County Court judge on 2 October 1991.

According to the case-law of the Constitutional Court, Article 262 of the CCP was to be interpreted as enabling an appellate court to remit a case to another chamber or another first-instance court only

of her public care.

The case came before three levels of jurisdiction. The applicant also maintained that no complex question of law or fact had had to be determined. 39.

The case came before three levels of jurisdiction. The applicant also maintained that no complex question of law or fact had had to be determined. 35.