In 2012 the applicant became 65 years old.

Subsequently, the applicant's lawyer requested the court not to schedule any hearings until 30 August 1997 because of his holidays.

It held that the extension had been lawful because the application for the extension had been lodged by a competent prosecutor within the established time-limits.

The officers further confirmed that Mr Beker had been unhappy because his mother had allegedly disapproved of him marrying his girlfriend.

DES PRODUITS SIDERURGIQUES demande au Conseil d'Etat : 1°) d'annuler le décret n° 93-1367 du 30 décembre 1993, autorisant Usinor Sacilor à céder ses participations dans les sociétés Nozal, Merlin, Béraud-Sudreau

On 15 October 1998, ten days later, the tractor hit a police car because the braking system failed.

The applicant indicated that he had undergone nose and throat surgery because of his snoring.

The litigation did determine the applicant’s “civil rights and obligations” because his own pension had been at stake.

That hearing was adjourned until 14 October 1999 because the respondent defaulted.

On 1   October 1999 the Zarechenskiy Town Court discontinued the proceedings because the applicant had defaulted on several occasions.

The judgment became final. COMPLAINTS 1.

The victim stated that he did not remember being ill-treated personally because of his advanced state of intoxication.

Hungary judgment of 11/01/2011     Introductory case summary   The Court found violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention because of the manner in which the question of prolongation of

When questioned, the couple (Mr and Mrs   G.) explained that the mother had signed a consent form entrusting the child to their care because she could not afford to bring her up.

Judge D.C. suggested to X. that he should request custody of the child and that the daughter should not live with the applicant because of her sexual orientation.

It   acknowledged that the applicant had interest in the proceedings; not least because of her inheritance rights.

According to this decision the applicant could not be heard by the first instance court because he had been detected Covid-positive.

The husband denied the allegation and declared that the applicant had run away with him because her family was against their marriage.

before the Supreme Administrative Court: the first applicant applied to the court to annul her pay-slip; the second applicant – the Public Service Trade Union Confederation – sought judicial review because