Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2026:CO10199
20 mai 2026
20 mai 2026
Sur le rapport de Mme Guillou, conseillère, les observations écrites de la SCP Gatineau, Fattaccini et Rebeyrol, avocat de la société Millet rail, de la SARL Le Prado - Gilbert, avocat de la société Comptoir
Source officiellecomm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2026:CO10197
20 mai 2026
20 mai 2026
Sur le rapport de Mme Guillou, conseillère, les observations écrites de la SCP Célice, Texidor, Périer, avocat des sociétés Axa France IARD et Transports Combronde, de la SCP Rocheteau, Uzan-Sarano et
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC003559402
27 mars 2008
27 mars 2008
On 18 September 2002, before the Magistrates’ Court, the applicant pleaded not guilty to the speeding offence and the prosecution sought to rely on his admission.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113DEC000183404
13 novembre 2007
13 novembre 2007
R. guilty of murder of the applicants’ son, sentencing him to twelve and a half years’ imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115525
29 novembre 2012
29 novembre 2012
At the end of the trial, on 15 June 2010 the Kars Assize Court, on the basis of the evidence in the case file, found the police officers guilty as charged.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-171704
30 janvier 2017
30 janvier 2017
On 11 October 2013 the Split Municipal Court found H.M. guilty and sentenced him to community service.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159282
17 novembre 2015
17 novembre 2015
On 27 February 2009 the applicant was found guilty of administrative offence of drunk driving. His driving licence was withdrawn for a period of two years. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-166882
30 août 2016
30 août 2016
On 22 November 2010 the Sighnaghi District Court found the applicant guilty of the unlawful purchase and possession of drugs, and aiding the selling of drugs in particularly large quantities
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11825
23 janvier 2018
23 janvier 2018
disciplinary and administrative authorities had, through their reasoning or the language used in their decisions, allowed doubt to be cast on the applicant’s innocence even though he had not been found guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-170272
14 décembre 2016
14 décembre 2016
On 20 August 2009 the applicants were found guilty of committing fraud, through misfeasance, as an organised group and in respect of a large amount of money.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243687
13 mai 2025
13 mai 2025
Application no. 29698/23 Luka JERIĆ against Croatia lodged on 24 July 2023 communicated on 13 May 2025 STATEMENT OF FACTS The application concerns criminal proceedings in which the applicant was found guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204304
6 juillet 2020
6 juillet 2020
On 6 April 2017 the District Court found the applicant guilty of illegal drug possession and sentenced him to three years’ imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210006
12 avril 2021
12 avril 2021
MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the applicant’s conviction for desertion allegedly in breach of the nullum crimen sine lege principle enshrined in Article 7 of the Convention: he was found guilty
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2633151-2861954
5 février 2009
5 février 2009
On 2 December 2002 the same district court found the applicant guilty of the charges under Article 319 of the Criminal Code.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220909
17 octobre 2022
17 octobre 2022
the guilt of the two bankers, who had assumed responsibility for their actions and cooperated with the authorities.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC003749505
6 juillet 2010
6 juillet 2010
On 10 September 2003 the District Court found the applicant guilty of concerted infliction of grievous bodily harm on the victim, causing his death, and sentenced the applicant to six years' imprisonment
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155068
4 mai 2015
4 mai 2015
On 25 June 2010 that court found the applicant guilty of having purchased cannabis for personal use and imposed on him a fine of 850 Ukrainian hryvnias.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250000
7 avril 2026
7 avril 2026
On appeal by both the applicants and the prosecuting authorities, the Ganja Court of Appeal partly quashed the lower court’s judgment, found the applicants guilty of murder, and sentenced them to cumulative
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7393
10 janvier 2013
10 janvier 2013
In a judgment of January 2007 the court of appeal set aside the first-instance judgment and found the applicants guilty of copyright infringement.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0604DEC003944814
4 juin 2019
4 juin 2019
Article XXVIII(2) of the Fundamental Law reads as follows: “No one shall be considered guilty until his or her criminal liability has been established by the final decision of a court.”
Source officiellePage 61 sur 1314