Accordingly, the search at the applicant’s home and the information capable of being discovered therefrom came within the sphere of protection under Article   10.

No such compensation, accompanied by appropriate safeguards, had been offered to the applicant in the present case. Conclusion : violation (unanimously).

The applicant’s doubts as to the impartiality of the Regional Court in the present case had been objectively justified.

font-style:italic } Published on 16 December 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 38044/23 R.P.A. against Romania lodged on 12 October 2023 communicated on 25 November 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

In the case of Edilsud 2014 S.r.l. Semplificata and Ferreri v.

  In the case of Mordachev v.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Law – Article 3 (substantive aspect): (a) Establishment of the facts – In the recent case of S.P. and Others v.

Following an appeal on points of law, the appellate court’s decision was set aside by the Court of Cassation and the case was remitted to the Fourth Division of the Court of Appeal.

of Deixler against Austria, in which the Committee of Ministers decided that there had been in this case a violation of Article   6, paragraph   1, of the Convention with regard to the length

Italy - 62155/00 Judgment 5.7.2007 [Section II] Article 35 Article 35-1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Effective domestic remedy Knowledge of change in the case-law of the Court of Cassation could not

without taking into account the criteria set out in the Court’s case-law.

The applicants’ cases have remained suspended before the first-instance courts ever since.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties.

As regards the applicability of Article   10 of the Convention, that provision was no broader in scope than Article   8 vis-à-vis the circumstances of the present case.

Therefore, it was not a mere value judgment but an untrue statement of fact.

    A case will, however, only fall in the second category if: (a) the healthcare providers’ acts and omissions went beyond mere error or medical negligence, but those providers denied emergency

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties.