CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0318DEC005334908
18 mars 2010
courts are, and are accepted by the public at large as being, the proper forum for the settlement of legal disputes and for the determination of a person’s guilt or innocence on a criminal charge (see Worm
Page 61 sur 76
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0304REP002477394
4 mars 1998
United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 217, pp. 28-29, para. 50; Worm v. Austria judgment of 29 August 1997, para. 47, to be published in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0906JUD001688315
6 septembre 2018
The rule also affords the prospective applicant time to consider whether to lodge an application and, if so, to decide on the specific complaints and arguments to be raised (see, for example, Worm v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC006135000
9 juillet 2002
applicant is entitled, pursuant to domestic law, to be served ex officio with a written copy of the final domestic decision, irrespective of whether that judgment was previously delivered orally (see the Worm
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626DEC000201006
26 juin 2007
For better or worse, the process was deliberately changed. [7] The 1991 Act cannot in my opinion be interpreted as conferring any right on a parent in the position of Mrs <K>.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1023DEC003321896
23 octobre 2001
W.H., the father of the two youngest children, was recorded as not cohabiting and the mother had stated that she would not marry him as she would be worse off financially.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0522DEC007027601
22 mai 2003
placed in the Butyrka prison, which the applicant describes as being notorious for its exceptionally poor conditions, including extreme overcrowding, being rife with serious infectious diseases, and much worse
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD003919998
26 juillet 2005
As the plaintiff already stated, its situation, [assessed as bad by the Court of Appeal already on 25 May 1995] had not improved but had become worse.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC003864297
4 mai 2000
had taken] the enormous risk of a 'blunder' of [that] kind” and that by “subsequently distorting the truth and ordering his entire unit to keep quiet or to tell lies he [had] made matters considerably worse
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD004358709
24 juillet 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0630JUD005677810
30 juin 2016
It found that the situation of those who, due to a lack of financial means, could not pay for the court fees and were obliged to request legal aid, was not worse than the situation of those with sufficient
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC000320209
17 septembre 2013
The mere fact of return to a country where the applicant’s economic position will be worse than in a Contracting State is not sufficient to meet the threshold of ill-treatment proscribed by Article 3 (
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0107JUD006092200
7 janvier 2010
As it was common knowledge that these detention facilities were much worse than the prisons, it must be concluded that the applicant had not been examined by a doctor over the said period in spite of his
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000049717
20 juin 2019
Therefore, anyone whom a criminal court trusted to act in conformity with the law in the future and, accordingly, whose sentence it thus suspended on probation, would be afforded worse treatment than a
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406DEC003522197
6 avril 2000
inter alia , that in 1987 he brought an action alleging that justice required that he is compensated for the care and services he performed for Mrs F., only to find himself, nine years later, in an even worse
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0309JUD007378601
9 mars 2006
The applicant stressed that the toilets in B wing had been renovated to a certain degree and that they had been in a much worse state of repair.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921JUD003498605
21 septembre 2010
decision, the object and purpose of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention are best served by counting the six-month period as running from the date of service of the written judgment (see Worm
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124DEC001183807
24 janvier 2012
The Court reiterates that it is primarily for the domestic courts to interpret and apply domestic legislation ( Worm v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1002JUD000426104
2 octobre 2014
entitled – pursuant to domestic law – to be served automatically with a written copy of the final domestic decision, irrespective of whether or not that judgment was previously delivered orally (see Worm
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC007387411
18 juin 2013
The Court further reiterates that the mere fact of return to a country where one’s economic position will be worse than in the expelling Contracting State is not sufficient to meet the threshold