Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC005016506
12 janvier 2010
12 janvier 2010
Section), sitting on 12 January 2010 as a Chamber composed of: Peer Lorenzen, President, Renate Jaeger, Karel Jungwiert, Rait Maruste, Mark Villiger, Isabelle
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106DEC004963510
6 novembre 2012
6 novembre 2012
These offences were not part of a person’s criminal record. 23.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1204JUD001399105
4 décembre 2014
4 décembre 2014
In these circumstances it is not necessary to examine whether the proceedings were conducted with “special diligence”. 43.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421DEC005781213
21 avril 2015
21 avril 2015
The driver had said that they were on their way to a wedding in restaurant Y. B had seen that the driver was wearing a camouflage uniform. There were three other men in the van.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0827DEC003636709
27 août 2013
27 août 2013
They were of Chechen ethnic origin. Two of them grabbed Rustam Kagirov and forced him into the back seat.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607DEC000277710
7 juin 2011
7 juin 2011
They were represented before the Court by Mr T. Dumoulin, a lawyer practising in Lyons. A.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2953286-3250185
3 décembre 2009
3 décembre 2009
Judgment was given by a Chamber of seven judges, composed as follows: Peer Lorenzen (Denmark), President, Karel Jungwiert (Czech Republic), Rait Maruste (Estonia), Mark Villiger (Liechtenstein), Isabelle
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3210599-3620856
1 septembre 2010
1 septembre 2010
The applicant objected, arguing that he ran the risk of detention in Greece in appalling conditions, that there were deficiencies in the asylum system in Greece and that he feared ultimately being sent
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2059028-2179320
11 juillet 2007
11 juillet 2007
the Italian embassy in Tunis requested the Tunisian Government to provide a copy of the alleged judgment convicting the applicant in Tunisia, as well as diplomatic assurances that, if the applicant were
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318DEC002156003
18 mars 2008
18 mars 2008
The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Dimova, of the Ministry of Justice. A.
Source officielleChambre Sociale
670a1185f178dc2492b0fc94
11 octobre 2024
11 octobre 2024
11 OCTOBRE 2024 DÉCISION DÉFÉRÉE : 18/00988 Jugement du POLE SOCIAL DU TJ DE ROUEN du 08 Juin 2021 APPELANT : Monsieur [I] [F] [Adresse 1] [Localité 8] représenté par Me Isabelle
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3104296-3440196
22 avril 2010
22 avril 2010
France (application no. 29808/06) DOUBTS CONCERNING THE IMPARTIALITY OF TWO JUDGES WHO CONVICTED A DRUG TRAFFICKER WERE JUSTIFIED Violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117DEC000659308
17 janvier 2012
17 janvier 2012
On 29 November 2004 the applicant and four others were arrested on suspicion of involvement in an illegal organisation.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211JUD000365305
11 décembre 2012
11 décembre 2012
Several hours later they were allowed to go home but were instructed to come back the next morning. On 18 October 2003 they were taken to the Prosecutor General’s Office in Baku.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120DEC002069612
20 novembre 2012
20 novembre 2012
The assurances of the Prosecutor General’s Office of Belarus were sufficiently specific.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0507JUD005913509
7 mai 2015
7 mai 2015
His pupils and tendon reflexes were at equal distance from each side and they were alive. Meningitis symptoms and pathological reflexes were not observed.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0411JUD002667606
11 avril 2013
11 avril 2013
There were no insects or rodents in the detention facility, as all the cells were disinfected regularly.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0124JUD001475503
24 janvier 2008
24 janvier 2008
The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I. Reine. 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326DEC001324911
26 mars 2019
26 mars 2019
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr I. Lishchyna. The circumstances of the case 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0411JUD001881306
11 avril 2013
11 avril 2013
The windows were large and were not blocked by shutters. The cells had sufficient artificial light, which was located so as not to disturb the sleep of the inmates.
Source officiellePage 62 sur 131