not have waited until 8   May 2013.

He claimed to have been beaten up during his arrest.

The persons concerned shall have the right to participate in proceedings before those commissions.

Since 3 March 2011 an OMON unit has been permanently stationed at the remand prison and its officers have constantly beaten up detainees and insulted their religious beliefs.

The Court reiterates that Contracting States have the right to control the entry, residence and removal of aliens.

That amount corresponded to the sum they would have received if their case had not been determined by legislative action.

Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 9 April 2013 as a Committee composed of:   Elisabeth Steiner, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Linos-Alexandre

The injuries had been caused by blunt objects and flat surfaces, and could have occurred when falling from a height.

Therefore, any action in the Maltese courts before 2010 would have failed. Owners thus could not have been blamed for initiating proceedings at that time. 35.

    The total number of Moldovans who have obtained Romanian citizenship since 1991 is unknown as the Romanian government have never made this information public.

    The Court relies on the principles adopted in respect of the six ‑ month time ‑ limit rule, as stated in its case-law in cases where applicants have availed themselves of an

The court further held that, in such circumstances, the Bayil Prison authorities could not be considered to have ill-treated the applicant in any way.

It is important to note that in the initial stages of negotiations, private kindergartens in Rijeka insisted not to have the prices they charged to parents limited.

The expert concluded that the injuries could have been inflicted by blunt objects on 5-6 May 2008. 22.

It considered that in its decision of 13 November 2008 the County Court could not have specified the final date of the applicant’s custody, as it would not have been possible to foresee the exact date

The Court observes, however, that the applicants have never brought such an action before the domestic courts.

Moreover, before an accused can be said to have by implication, through his conduct, waived an important right under Article 6, it must be shown that he could reasonably have foreseen what the consequences

    When did the applicants learn, or ought they to have learned, that the judgments were no longer enforceable 47.

In that way he would also have complied with his obligation to declare the weapon and no offence would have been committed. The Court’s assessment 45 .