CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315JUD000245811
15 mars 2022
of 28   November 2008 No reason to rule on attorney fees since there is no decision on the merits 15/03/2010: The Court of Cassation upheld the judgment dismissing the appeal and the decision became
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD000846007
3 février 2011
of Article 35 § 1 to take the start of the six-month period from the date when the applicant first became or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Paul and Aubrey Edwards v. the United
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0928JUD001286887
28 septembre 1995
, and then until 30 April 1989, by Legislative Decree no. 551 of 30 December 1988, which became Law no. 61 of 21 February 1989.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD001450204
2 novembre 2006
(Application no. 14502/04)       JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   2 November 2006       FINAL     26/03/2007     This judgment will become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1130JUD003437497
30 novembre 1999
    The Government further stated that the applicant had become marginalised in France through his use of and trade in narcotics.
Cour d'Appel
6253ca1cbd3db21cbdd8a11f
23 octobre 2007
X... et la BECM, -débouté M. X... de sa demande en remboursement d'une somme de 498. 086,58 F dirigée contre la BECM, -condamné M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022JUD000535311
22 octobre 2013
    On 22 September 2007 the judgment became final. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD000835507
4 décembre 2008
    The judgment was not appealed against and became enforceable on 15   November 2000.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018JUD004658199
18 octobre 2005
No appeal was lodged and the judgment became final. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD000527105
The applicant had complained to the Court more than six months after the judgment had become binding and had been clarified.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD003764104
6 décembre 2007
(Application no. 37641/04)     JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG     6 December 2007       FINAL     06/03/2008     This judgment will become
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1952452-2061288
20 mars 2007
She cannot see objects more than 1.50 metres away and fears that she will eventually become blind.     2.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174134
12 mai 2017
The applicant submitted that these plots had been divided by the decision of 24   June 2002 by the Mayor of the municipality and that these plots became property of the municipality on that day.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7226
30 octobre 2012
In 2008, at the age of fourteen, the first applicant, P., became pregnant after being raped.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0109DEC005491900
9 janvier 2003
However, in a case where an applicant avails himself of a domestic remedy and it becomes clear, at a later stage, that this remedy was not effective, the six-month period provided for in Article 35 of
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520DEC003183696
20 mai 1998
The court stated that her conviction for resisting police arrest had been upheld by the decision of the Court of Cassation and that it had become final on 28 March 1995.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1005DEC006403300
5 octobre 2004
The above decision thus became final and enforceable.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629JUD003536708
29 juin 2010
#xa0;               JUDGMENT (just satisfaction-striking out)     STRASBOURG   29 June 2010   FINAL   29/09/2010   This judgment has become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0704JUD004417398
4 juillet 2002
    By a judgment of 16 April 1998, filed with the registry on 23   April   1998, the District Court held that the charges had become time-barred in July 1997. THE LAW I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0407DEC004049504
7 avril 2009
No appeal was apparently lodged against the judgment and it became final. 2.
Page 63 sur 1474
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.