2010 Korolyovskyy District Court of Zhytomyr, 16 July 2009 3 February 2012, 450 8. 35521/10 GRYBAN , Rayisa Stepanivna, 1931 14 June 2010 Zhytomyr District Administrative Court, 20 December 2007 3 February

The applicant claimed that he had given truthful information on 9 February 2004.

  61   On 24 February 1993, the applicant met the Elazığ Governor and requested that his brother be found. On 25 February 1993.

12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 22 February

1964   Anna IORIO 1952   Fedele IORIO 1955   Antonella Teresa CACCAVALE 1984     Diana CACCAVALE 1989   Paul Benni DE SIO NAEBO 1961           Ferraro

          By letter dated 14 February and received at the Court on 15 February 1984 the applicant's counsel again applied for reinstate- ment.

Municipal Court in Kragujevac 2P-XX-5051/03 of 6 February 2007 1. Municipal Court in Kragujevac   I-1-7/2004 of 6 February 2004 2.

On 14   February 2005 the Ivanovo Regional Court upheld the judgment. On 18 February 2005 the prosecutor received the case file.

C A, représenté par Me Febbraro, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 22 février 2023 par lequel la préfète de Vaucluse l'a obligé à quitter le territoire français sans délai, a fixé le pays

1998 and 24 February 1998.

The decision was ultimately confirmed by the Central Tax Directorate on 8   February 1999. 7.

European Court, 20 February 1996, European Court Reports 1996-I, p. 224 ff).

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2002)41 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 8 February

} .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2000)152 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 15 February

margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2001)159 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 29 February

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2003)46 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 14 February

} .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2006)80 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of the 3 February

margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   RESOLUTION DH (97) 221 CONCERNING THE JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF 20 FEBRUARY

uppercase } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2005)97 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 February

Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Öztürk case, delivered on 21 February