. : 07 / 00036 CONSEIL DE PRUD' HOMMES D' AVIGNON 30 novembre 2006 Section : Industrie SA GROUPE GUILLIN HOLDING C / A...- B...

. : 07 / 00038 CONSEIL DE PRUD' HOMMES D' AVIGNON 30 novembre 2006 Section : Industrie SA GROUPE GUILLIN HOLDING C / X...

    In so far as is relevant, Article 376A of the Code of Criminal Procedure reads: “If the jury’s verdict is that the person is not guilty, but the court finds that he is undoubtedly guilty,

        The refusal of the accused to give evidence on his own behalf       does not in itself indicate guilt.

of a criminal offence until his guilt has been established by a final court judgement.

    A prisoner was guilty of an offence against discipline if he committed an assault (Rule 47(1) of the Prison Rules).

He also pleaded not guilty.   Riga Regional Court found the applicant guilty under Article 68-3 and imposed an immediate six-year custodial sentence.

Croatia, no. 19120/15 By a judgment of the Zagreb Minor Offences Court ( Prekršajni sud u Zagrebu ) of 9 August 2012, the applicant was found guilty of sport hooliganism related to disorder that he had

any other evidence supporting this allegation, the applicant stated that he did not have a legal obligation to make a copy of the document concerned and that it was up to the plaintiff to prove his guilt

It was unacceptable that somebody be found guilty of defamation for submissions made in a criminal complaint filed against a public official.

He entered a not guilty plea.   The Riga Regional Court found him guilty and imposed an immediate six-year custodial sentence.

Françis et de GUILLEUX Brigitte Demeurant La Basse Masure - 35410 OSSE intimé comparant, assisté de Maître MAILLARD Bertrand, avocat à Rennes -M.ET MME Y...

guilt has been established by a court ( Konstas v.

The applicant was found guilty as charged and fined 1,200 Croatian kunas (HRK).

The first-instance court found him guilty as charged and sentenced him to 6 months’ imprisonment, suspended for two years.

October 2020 Published on 16 November 2020   SECOND SECTION Application no. 27794/16 Boško RADANOVIĆ against Serbia lodged on 10 May 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE In 2013 the applicant was found guilty

In March 1995 the State Security Court found him guilty and sentenced him to one year’s imprisonment and a fine. The applicant unsuccessfully appealed to the Court of Cassation.

The son contested the administrative decision imposing the fine, and pleaded not guilty before the District Court.

The applicants were nonetheless extradited and have since been found guilty and sentenced to terms of imprisonment by the High Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

The domestic courts found him guilty under Article 168-1.3.1 (breach of the requirements for conducting religious propaganda, rites and rituals) of the Criminal Code, which criminalised at the material