Where there was no possibility of challenging the alleged application of secret surveillance measures at domestic level, widespread suspicion and concern among the general public that secret surveillance

Regional Government) and two levels of jurisdiction (namely the Constitutional Court and the Administrative Court), including several remittals. 24.

Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction   Amount awarded for pecuniary

Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth Representative name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction   Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage

These developments coincided in time with a reform of the system of appeals in Russian criminal proceedings in which an appeal instance was added at the regional level and two levels of cassation proceedings

costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     48990/16 15/08/2016 Julianna LŐCSEI 27/05/1966     23/08/2007   17/02/2016   8 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 26 day(s) 2 level

They thus took five years and six and a half months at two levels of jurisdiction.

The Court finds that the redress provided to the applicant at domestic level, considered on the basis of the facts of which he complains before the Court, was insufficient (see   Janulis   v.

Chapter XIX “Final Provisions” and paragraph 5 of part 1 of Chapter XX “Transitional Provisions” (see “Relevant domestic law” below), the judge considered that the amount of the non-taxable minimum-level

expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     69816/13 25/10/2013 Valeriy Vladimirovich Bezborodov 27/07/1970     14/03/2006   29/08/2013   7 years, 5 months and 16 days 2 levels

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

    The applicants complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the public had no access to the hearings in their cases at both levels of jurisdiction. 20.

The Court finds that the redress provided to the applicants at the domestic level, considered on the basis of the facts of which they complain before the Court, was insufficient (see Janulis v.

The Court finds that the redress provided to the applicant at the domestic level, considered on the basis of the facts of which he complains before the Court, was insufficient (see Janulis v.

  20193/15 and 2 others, §   9, 23 June 2022), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

euros) [1]       28814/19 23/05/2019 László Béláné KISHÁZI 23/08/1947 Kecskés Ákos Zoltán Hódmezővásárhely 15/10/2008   29/11/2018   10 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 15 day(s) 2 level

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction Other complaints under well-established

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

There was no justification for any reduction in the level of compensation. The State Treasury accepted the claim up to PLN 58,140.