42007/98) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the

United Kingdom or any part of the United Kingdom other than Northern Ireland. (3)     The power of arrest conferred by subsection (1)(c) above is exercisable only– (a)     in Great Britain

    The case originated in an application (no. 36273/97) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”

    The case originated in three applications (nos. 45825/99, 45826/99 and 45827/99) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of

  39393/98) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the

Jugement Conseil de Prud'hommes d'ANGERS, du 04 Octobre 2010, enregistrée sous le no 09/ 01202 APPELANTE : Madame Florence X... ... 49125 BRIOLLAY présente, assistée de Maître Bertrand

  The present case was referred to the Court in October 1980 by both the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission") and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern

submissions may well accurately reflect the position under the ECHR at the public international law level, and indeed in those jurisdictions (like the British Overseas Territories in the Caribbean and Britain

The case originated in seven applications (nos. 5947/72, 6205/73, 7052/75, 7061/75, 7107/75, 7113/75 and 7136/75) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission

    The case originated in an application (no. 6638/03) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

of criminal activity"; carried out on 30/05/2018; Magadan Regional Court rejected the appeal complaints on 18/07/2018 - 15,000 to each applicant     52867/18 01/11/2018 Sergey Alekseyevich BRITVIN

    The case originated in an application (no. 34640/04) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

Avocat plaidant : Me BROGLIN, avocat à COLMAR. 3/ La compagnie d'assurance CAISSE D'ASSURANCE MUTUELLE DU BATIMENT ET DES TRA VAUX PUBLICS - CAMBTP prise en la personne de son représentant légal,

BRIOSON, RCS de [Localité 49] sous le n°342 547 320, agissant poursuites et diligences en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 40] [Localité 50]

    The case originated in an application (no. 34575/04) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

règlement du site patrimonial remarquable de Saint-Brieuc : " () V-7 Le bâti neuf et les extensions de bâti existant / Les interventions nouvelles doivent constituer l'une des strates de l'architecture briochine

Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 7 août 2023, Me Leblay, mandataire judiciaire de la société Octant architecture, représenté par Me Broglin, conclut : 1°) à titre principal, au rejet de la requête

    The case originated in an application (no. 65282/09) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

Articles 10, 11 and 15 of the Treaty of 11 January 1932 concluded by the President of the Republic of Poland and His Majesty the King of Great Britain, Ireland and the British Dominions beyond the Seas