The first two were dismissed in court decisions of 21 January and 29 April 2003.

In particular, they stated that in 2001 there were 27 inspections conducted in Zamkova Prison, as a result of which 29 officials were subjected to different sanctions, in 2002 there were 29 inspections

    The applicants were represented by Mr V. Gredelj, a lawyer practising in Bjelovar. The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.

AR and RT were unable to give details about the blows inflicted by VG.

    The applicants, who were granted legal aid, were represented by Mr   E. Abrahamson, a solicitor practising in Liverpool.

At least 3,116 lives were lost, among them the 246   passengers of the planes.

    The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. A.     The circumstances of the case 3.

When they were leaving they had seen many parts of the village burning. 8.

performed outside the legal conditions of Article 218a of the Criminal Code and were thus subject to criminal prosecution.

Again it was argued that the statements by Ms E.N. and Ms T.N. were to be disregarded since “according to the information received, both the N. sisters [were] prostitutes and acquaintances of Mr Zelenin

Furthermore, the relevant European directives were binding for Greece.

    Hearings were held on 23 and 24 September 2010.

Socially-owned companies were the flagship of the Yugoslav model of self-management: neither private nor State-owned, they were a collective property controlled by their employees, based on a communist

The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Kotseva, of the Ministry of Justice. 3.

The court proceedings were recommenced with another judge.

Almost 18,000 applications were received and leave to remain was granted to all but 1119 which were found not to qualify.

At the first and second hearings on 23 December 2008 and 17   February 2009, requests made by the applicant for his release were rejected, having regard to the nature of the offence, the state of

, Président de Chambre Martine CONTE, Conseiller Isabelle DIEPENBROEK, Conseiller qui en ont délibéré.

The letters were handed to the prison administration by him in envelopes bearing the address of the lawyer, but opened, in conformity with the prison rules.