Le requérant, qui a été admis au bénéfice de l'assistance judiciaire, est représenté par M e   A. de Brossin de Mere, avocate à Paris.

première instance 22/02198 ARRET DU 28 AVRIL 2026 APPELANTE : Madame [J] [L] veuve [K] née le [Date naissance 1] 1959 à [Localité 1] [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] Représentée par Me Jean BROUIN

décision attaquée en date du 26 Février 2021, enregistrée sous le n° 19/00236 ARRÊT DU 19 Janvier 2023 APPELANT : Monsieur [H] [W] [Adresse 10] [Localité 4] représenté par Me Jean BROUIN

; -condamné la société [Adresse 17] représentée par la SCP BTSG², prise en la personne de maître [N] [L], en qualité de liquidateur aux entiers dépens dont distraction au profit de maître Benoît Brogin

DU 09 AVRIL 2024 APPELANTE : SCP DE MANDATAIRES JUDICIAIRES [M]-[Y] prise en sa qualité de mandataire liquidateur à la LJ de la SAS [J] [Adresse 3] [Adresse 3] Représentée par Me Jean BROUIN

... 83510 LORGUES (bénéficie d'une aide juridictionnelle Partielle numéro 2012/ 0000141 du 19/ 01/ 2012 accordée par le bureau d'aide juridictionnelle de ANGERS) comparante assistée de Maître BROUIN

It originated in an application (no. 25599/94) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 by a British national, “A.”, on 15 July 1994.

The Iron Age Druids of Britain were highly-respected healers, judges, prophets and teachers of mystical philosophy.

    The case originated in an application (no. 37212/02) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

    The case originated in an application (no. 35765/97) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”

  32771/96) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the

  28212/95) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the

    The case was referred to the Court, as established under former Article 19 of the Convention [3] , by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“the Government

The applicant complained under Article 14 that she had been treated less favourably than those in the situation where a soldier had killed a civilian in Great Britain or where a civilian had killed someone

    The case originated in an application (no. 22510/13) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

The extension was sought as the results of further forensic tests which had been sent for analysis to a laboratory in Great Britain were expected to become available within the following seven days and

    The case originated in an application (no. 32621/11) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

She was charged with conspiracy to cause explosions on mainland Britain.   She was sentenced to life imprisonment. The first applicant has been classified as a Category A prisoner.

    The case originated in an application (no. 62824/16) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection