CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD002960412
14 novembre 2013
He never went to get it and has not been seen or heard of since. 47 .
Page 67 sur 131
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0106DEC000077012
6 janvier 2015
Specifically, the parties were referred to the Sesvete Social Welfare Centre. for the institution of this procedure. 10.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD002570311
20 octobre 2015
The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204JUD005963109
4 décembre 2012
The applicants were represented by Mr H. Simon, a lawyer practising in Vienna. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD003189011
3 octobre 2013
They fled and were on the wanted list for over two years ...” 23 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0114JUD003681503
14 janvier 2010
The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Lazareska Gerovska. 3.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019DEC004436017
19 octobre 2021
The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr. M.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1029JUD005442708
29 octobre 2015
In the case of Isayev v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0702JUD002972204
2 juillet 2009
The applicants were represented by Mr S. Andreev, a lawyer practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs S.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD002866004
13 janvier 2011
Although the domestic courts were required to examine a certain amount of documentary evidence, the issues before them were not of such a nature as to necessitate prolonged consideration
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921DEC000548002
21 septembre 2010
The immediate attempts to resuscitate him were unsuccessful.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0414DEC001318204
14 avril 2009
There were three men (the applicant, Mr G. and Mr O.) and two women.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD002582102
12 juin 2008
The following hearings were scheduled for 25 April and 17 June 2002 respectively.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD002278206
It does not appear that the applicants were informed of this decision. 29.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1019JUD004337004
19 octobre 2012
These allegations were firmly denied by the Russian authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD000000708
27 avril 2010
It held that the provisions of the Law were clear and unambiguous, that they were accessible in that they were published in the Official Gazette and that they were foreseeable as they enabled, with sufficient
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0212JUD005572200
12 février 2009
The applicants were represented by Ms M. Barutchiyska, a lawyer practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0930DEC003496004
30 septembre 2008
Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The first applicant, the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden (“the applicant association” or “Ilinden”), is an organisation based in south-west
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD000221505
No further details concerning the warrant were given. 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0530JUD002172403
30 mai 2013
The applicants were, however, unable to submit a publishing agreement. 10 .