In the leading case of Idalov v.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27   November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.

    Bearing those principles in mind in its leading judgment of N.T. v.

    In the leading cases of Kharchenko v.   Ukraine (no.   40107/02, 10   February   2011) and Ignatov v.   Ukraine (no.

In addition, because L. had repeatedly failed to respond to their summons, the bailiffs unsuccessfully sought the initiation of criminal proceedings against her and a temporary ban on her leaving the country

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27   November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading cases of R. Kačapor and Others v. Serbia, nos. 2269/06 and 5 others, §§ 97-99, 106-16 and 119-20, 15 January 2008, Crnišanin and Others v.

6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention, the applicant complained that she had been denied access to a court on account of the domestic courts’ failure to address and rule on her compensation claim, leaving

    In the leading case of Vlad and Others v.

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Idalov v.

    In the leading case of Ananyev and Others v.

    In the leading case of Nechay v. Ukraine, no. 15360/10, 1 July 2021 the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

In the Court’s view, leaving the secret surveillance operation to the sole discretion of law enforcement authorities, the domestic law failed to provide adequate safeguards against various possible abuses

    In the leading case of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006; for more recent case-law see Beketov v.