CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD000153503
10 août 2006
  In February 2003 the Novogrodovskaya Mining Company was reorganised and became a structural subdivision of the Selidovugol Mining Company.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0201JUD003368905
1 février 2007
  (Application no. 33689/05)     JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   1 February 2007       FINAL     01/05/2007     This judgment will become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0201JUD003370605
  (Application no. 33706/05)     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG     1 February 2007       FINAL     01/05/2007     This judgment will become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0201JUD003370705
(Application no. 33707/05)       JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   1 February 2007       FINAL     01/05/2007     This judgment will become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0426JUD004151398
26 avril 2001
xa0; (Application no. 41513/98)     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   26 April 2001       FINAL   26/07/2001           This judgment will become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0211JUD001439005
11 février 2010
The appeal judgment became enforceable on the same day. 13.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-140851
16 octobre 2013
  The three sets of proceedings that were pending at the time of the Court’s judgment have since become final.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0304JUD004400905
4 mars 2010
He also informed the Court that on 12 May 2009 the decision of 27 April 2009 of the Vasileostrovskiy District Court of St Petersburg had became final and acquired legal force. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1016JUD004156405
16 octobre 2008
This judgment became binding on 6 October 2003, but was not enforced immediately. 7.     On 23 October 2003 the District Court mailed enforcement papers to bailiffs.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213JUD003326411
13 février 2018
    The settlement became final on the same date. 6.     The debtor ultimately paid part of the amounts determined in the settlement. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0504JUD007079801
4 mai 2006
It became final and binding on 25 September 1997. 7.     On 20 April 1998 the applicant requested the Bratislava III District Court to enforce its order. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0512JUD003802905
12 mai 2010
RUSSIA   (Application no. 38029/05)             JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   12 May 2010   FINAL   12/08/2010   This judgment has become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1205JUD005196399
5 décembre 2006
Shortly thereafter, in 1990, the applicants became parties to the proceedings. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1214JUD002943504
14 décembre 2006
#xa0; JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   14   December 2006       FINAL     14/03/2007               This judgment will become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928JUD001391004
28 septembre 2006
The judgment became final on 22 June 2004. THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0626JUD000073104
26 juin 2008
Each judgment became binding ten days after its delivery, but was not enforced immediately. 6.     The judgment of 18 May 2001 was enforced on 26 December 2001. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0201JUD003368505
  (Application no. 33685/05)     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   1 February 2007         FINAL     01/05/2007     This judgment will become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD002896502
6 décembre 2007
(Application no. 28965/02)     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG     6 December 2007         FINAL     02/06/2008     This judgment will become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD002641002
2 novembre 2006
The judgment was not appealed against and became final. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1016JUD006284900
16 octobre 2003
    On 21 June 1991, the applicant became the owner of the flat and pursued the enforcement proceedings 12.
Page 68 sur 1474
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.