He claimed in his asylum proceedings that in 2001 his father had been shot before his eyes.

all his defence rights (judgments nos.

His mother, J.S., had told him that Ljuban had died a natural death because he had not received his medication.

individual case or the seriousness of his particular offences.

His wrists had been tied behind his back with two plastic hose clamps and his feet had been tied with a piece of an electric cable to one of the tent poles. A.M.’s mouth was covered by adhesive tape.

or back to, his cell. 26.

One of the applicants requested the Minister to retract his allegations publicly or to waive the parliamentary privilege attaching to his statements, which would permit him to take proceedings in the courts

States may make that right subject to conditions and have a wide margin of appreciation, provided that they do not impair the very substance of the right and render it wholly ineffective.

The court dismissed as unfounded the applicant’s subsequent complaint for a violation of the right to be heard, noting that it had considered his submissions but that it was not obliged to respond to all

additional role in the prosecution of cases and his responsibility for discipline and order in his command.

his wife. 48 .

Court judge dealing with his defamation action had been unlawful and (iii) the courts’ decisions in his cases were arbitrary. 108.

, his citizenship, his relationship to the requesting State and the extradition request. 7.

  The Court committed the applicant to prison for 28 days on the basis, apparently, that his failure to pay was due to his culpable neglect.     21.

COMPLAINT The applicant complained that his transfer to Hungary with a view to serving the remainder of his sentence there resulted in a de facto sixteen-month increase in his term of imprisonment.

in favour of prolonging his detention on remand.

Following inquiries about his fees, the Court of Appeal requested W. to start preparing his expert opinion on 18 September 1985, and sent a reminder on 12 December 1985.

retirement and moved to Italy with his Italian wife.

However, the procedure had lasted nearly five months and no ruling on his appeal had been given by the time the prison authorities eventually changed their original decision.

speedily, and maintains his previous submissions."