CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 619 résultats pour « Isabel WERTER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD007348101

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2008

13 novembre 2008

They were all turned down by the Sofia City Court at the respective hearings.

Page 68 sur 131

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD000803007

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2011

20 décembre 2011

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0416JUD002667507

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2009

16 avril 2009

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0528JUD001079204

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2009

28 mai 2009

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110DEC003019006

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2009

10 novembre 2009

Petersburg, were expropriated by the Russian authorities without compensation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD002156507

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2013

4 avril 2013

    On 23 October 2008 the applications were communicated to the Government.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0507DEC003896710

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2013

7 mai 2013

The remaining bank accounts were released by a judgment of the Tartu Court of Appeal (see paragraph 9 below). 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211DEC006740510

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2012

11 décembre 2012

    The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. A.     The circumstances of the case 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD001071805

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2014

24 avril 2014

Seven packages containing an unknown substance were found.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD001840710

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2013

19 décembre 2013

The applicants themselves were not direct witnesses to the abduction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD000930007

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2011

20 janvier 2011

    It was not true that no surfaces in Germany were exempt from the hunt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD001828004

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2011

7 juillet 2011

The proceedings were resumed. 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621DEC000261510

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr V. A. Schorm. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122JUD002028710

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2011

22 novembre 2011

However, according to the policy in force, takings under titles of possession and use were converted to outright purchases in cases where the properties were used for commercial purposes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD003558708

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2014

31 juillet 2014

    The applicants were represented by E. Guliyev, a lawyer practising in Azerbaijan. The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç. Asgarov. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204JUD000649007

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2012

4 décembre 2012

The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920JUD004522305

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2007

20 septembre 2007

His family were land-owning farmers. His father was a member of the communist party and was a party representative in Ghuri.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC004048508

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2012

4 janvier 2012

    While awaiting the end of the surgery, the applicant’s husband went to the premises of the Vračar Police Department.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD000209107

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2012

24 juillet 2012

While the proceedings were pending, the State Security Courts were abolished and the criminal proceedings against the applicant were transferred to the Diyarbakır Assize Court, which subsequently convicted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1030JUD005381210

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2014

30 octobre 2014

The case against him had been complex and the charges were serious. Moreover, in the course of the investigation new criminal offences were discovered and new charges were brought against him.

Source officielle