CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD007348101
13 novembre 2008
They were all turned down by the Sofia City Court at the respective hearings.
Page 68 sur 131
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD000803007
20 décembre 2011
The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0416JUD002667507
16 avril 2009
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0528JUD001079204
28 mai 2009
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110DEC003019006
10 novembre 2009
Petersburg, were expropriated by the Russian authorities without compensation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD002156507
4 avril 2013
On 23 October 2008 the applications were communicated to the Government.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0507DEC003896710
7 mai 2013
The remaining bank accounts were released by a judgment of the Tartu Court of Appeal (see paragraph 9 below). 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211DEC006740510
11 décembre 2012
The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. A. The circumstances of the case 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD001071805
24 avril 2014
Seven packages containing an unknown substance were found.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD001840710
19 décembre 2013
The applicants themselves were not direct witnesses to the abduction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD000930007
20 janvier 2011
It was not true that no surfaces in Germany were exempt from the hunt.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD001828004
7 juillet 2011
The proceedings were resumed. 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621DEC000261510
21 juin 2011
The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr V. A. Schorm. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122JUD002028710
22 novembre 2011
However, according to the policy in force, takings under titles of possession and use were converted to outright purchases in cases where the properties were used for commercial purposes.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD003558708
31 juillet 2014
The applicants were represented by E. Guliyev, a lawyer practising in Azerbaijan. The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç. Asgarov. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204JUD000649007
4 décembre 2012
The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920JUD004522305
20 septembre 2007
His family were land-owning farmers. His father was a member of the communist party and was a party representative in Ghuri.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC004048508
4 janvier 2012
While awaiting the end of the surgery, the applicant’s husband went to the premises of the Vračar Police Department.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD000209107
24 juillet 2012
While the proceedings were pending, the State Security Courts were abolished and the criminal proceedings against the applicant were transferred to the Diyarbakır Assize Court, which subsequently convicted
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1030JUD005381210
30 octobre 2014
The case against him had been complex and the charges were serious. Moreover, in the course of the investigation new criminal offences were discovered and new charges were brought against him.