(Application no. 33728/05)     JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   1 February 2007       FINAL     01/05/2007     This judgment will become

    In 1996 the applicant was convicted and sentenced for embezzlement of the Company funds and his conviction became final.

Article 7 since that provision could not be interpreted as prohibiting an extension of limitation periods through the immediate application of a procedural law where the relevant offences have never become

    On 23 October 2006 the Palermo Assize Court of Appeal upheld the applicant’s conviction, which became final on 18 April 2008, following the rejection of the applicant’s appeal on points of

Ten days later the judgment became final and a writ of execution was issued and sent to the bailiffs. 7.

no. 28181/04)       JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   10   August 2006       FINAL     10/11/2006       This judgment will become

xa0; (Application no. 1419/02)     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG     3 August 2006       FINAL     03/11/2006       This judgment will become

; (Application no. 22924/02)       JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   10 August 2006       FINAL     10/11/2006       This judgment will become

  This judgment was upheld by the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine and became final.

xa0; (Application no. 45260/99)     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   26 April 2001       FINAL   26/07/2001           This judgment will become

The decision became final on 9   October 2008. B. Constitutional proceedings 21.

    The judgment was not appealed against and became final on 2   November 1997. 7.

In the absence of appeal, the restitution order became final on 18 June 2001. On 27 June 2002 the land had been transferred in the applicants’ factual possession ( владение ).

xa0; (Application no. 34442/97)                   JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG   6 November 2003           This judgment will become

    On 29 June 2006 the judgment became final. 9.

La BECM a constitué avocat et conclu. L'ordonnance de clôture est intervenue le 09 octobre 2019.

(a)     Date on which a judgment becomes final Article   356 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provided that a judgment took effect and became enforceable from the date on which the appellate

had become aware only very recently and not prior to the dispute that J.B.L. was associate professor at the University of Castilla-La Mancha.

That decision became final on 9   February 2007 after the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by the applicant’s lawyer.

No appeal lay against that judgment and, upon service on the parties, it became final on 13 June 2002.