The Court could not conclude that the Court of Appeal’s reading of the 2006 judgment was, viewed as a whole, the result of a manifest factual or legal error leading to a “denial of justice”.

Malta - 21974/07 Judgment 14.6.2011 [Section IV] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Denial of the right to appeal against a preliminary judgment: article 6 applicable; violation &#

of success in view of inadequacy of official investigation into killing – complaint under Article 6 § 1 in reality linked to Article 13 complaint that seriously deficient investigation resulted in denial

complain that the rejection of their claims for costs and expenses, as well as the “flagrantly divergent case-law of the domestic courts” on this issue, created legal uncertainty and amounted to a denial

The applicants further complain under Article 6 of the Convention about the duration of the eviction proceedings and about the denial of their right of access to a court.

Indeed, she had made no specific complaint to the Court of a lack of adversarial proceedings or denial of equality of arms. Conclusion : no violation (unanimously). See also Ramanauskas v.

Germany - 17080/07 Judgment 15.9.2011 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Denial of access to possible biological father without consideration of child’s

Cyprus - 33631/06 Judgment 13.10.2015 [Section IV] Article 14 Discrimination Denial of refugee card on the basis that the applicant was the child of a displaced woman rather than a displaced man: violation

The applicant further complains under Article 6 of the Convention about the duration of the eviction proceedings and about the denial of her right of access to a court.

the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the continuous denial

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the denial of access to the Civil Court of Appeal in breach of the applicant’s rights under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

, Mme A C B demande au juge des référés du tribunal administratif, statuant sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-3 du code de justice administrative : 1°) d'enjoindre au préfet de la Saint-Saint-Denisà

proceedings): Inter alia , the Court found that the Austrian courts had duly satisfied themselves, before authorising its enforcement, that the forfeiture order had not been the result of a flagrant denial

  (ii)     Did the domestic authorities’ failure to bring the applicant to the hearing dated 13 January 2009 due to lack of finances result in a denial of justice (see, mutatis mutandis

proceedings “within a reasonable time”, the circumstances of the applicant’s representation during his trial did not disclose a failure to provide legal assistance as required by Article 6 § 3 (c) or a denial

Serghides   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (the denial of access to a court in connection with the applicant

applicants assert that they are concerned about the fate of Serdar Tanış and Ebubekir Deniz, alleging that they were extrajudicially executed while in police custody, notwithstanding the authorities’ denials

Following the applicants’ constitutional appeal about a denial of protection against the police intervention, the Constitutional Court held in its judgment II.

There had been nothing arbitrary in the denial of priority need to the applicant.