The complaints were to no avail. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 44.     The Russian legal regulations for detention are explained in the judgments of Isayev v.

The applicants were represented by Mr Stefano Pagliai, a lawyer practising in Florence.

In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised.

    Principal facts   The applicants, Isabelle M.

    The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 that the domestic courts were prejudiced against him, breached domestic procedural rules and committed errors. 3.

On 26 July 2005 the Federal Court of Justice declared an appeal on points of law inadmissible in so far as alleged procedural irregularities were concerned, and the remainder of the appeal ill-founded.

Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 27 April 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   Rait Maruste,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle

All references to the “interest rate for secured bonds”, a rate which had not changed since 1981, were removed.

The Constitutional Court concluded that the programme and the articles of the association “were directed towards the violent destruction of the state order; hindrance of free expression of the national

  20930/06) were born in 1968 and live in Kremenchug; and Mr Yevgen Ivanovych Subot (no.   38753/06) was born in 1941 and lives in Rivne.

  The applications were lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 24 January 2006 and 12 February 2008 respectively. The Court decided to join the applications.

Subsequently these claims were severed. On 29   May 2002 the court stayed the compensation proceedings pending the determination of the dismissal proceedings.

discussed widely in the press, in government circles and in parliament, and the Court failed to see what further clarification he could still have provided as regards the facts on which his articles were

[U] [D] [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] représenté par Me Claude AUNAY, avocat au barreau du HAVRE INTIMEE : Etablissement Public [12] [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] représenté par Me Isabelle

sitting on 12   February 2008 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, président,   Snejana Botoucharova,   Karel Jungwiert,   Renate Jaeger,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle

Her applications in the first set of proceedings were dismissed, the second set resulted in a decision ordering the suspension of the plant’s operation, which was not implemented, and the third set is

Insbesondere trug er vor, dass es keinen ausreichenden Kausalzusammenhang zwischen seiner Verurteilung 1986 und seiner weiter andauernden Haft nach zehn Jahren in der Sicherungsverwahrung gebe.

    Principal facts   The applicants, Vasile Gheorghe Tătar and Paul Tătar, father and son, are Romanian nationals who were born in 1947 and 1979 respectively.

The Court is satisfied that the domestic courts cited specific facts in support of their conclusions that the applicants were liable to obstruct justice, to re-offend or abscond.