It is thus not the alleged lack of medical care as such which is at stake in this case but rather the alleged lack of a proper long-term care facility in which the applicant could be placed in Iraq. 37

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Judge [P.], who has been handling the case since its withdrawal from [Judges M. and L.L.] on 21 June, told them that the cassette was not in the case file and was not ‘registered in the file as an exhibit

In a judgment of March 1999 the Court of Cassation dismissed an appeal on points of law lodged by the applicants. The procedure before the Court of Cassation was held in private.

For the following reasons, due to the lack of such safeguards in the present case, the impugned interference could not be regarded as proportionate to the aim pursued.

agent of the State – nor was it decisive whether formal complaint about killing lodged with competent investigatory authority – in present case mere knowledge of killing on the part of the authorities

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

  The applicant did not allege that he is unfit, for health reasons, to serve the prison sentence concerned, that there would be insufficient health care in case of imprisonment or that he could not

for a decision on the case.

[U] dire 'ils me cassent les couilles ces bougnouls de merde' en parlant de M. [Y] ; - l'attestation de M.

This case was assigned to the newly composed First Section. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 8.     The applicant was born in 1953 and lives in Naples. 9.

By a decision of 13 January 2005 the Siedlce Regional Court allowed the applicant’s request to assign a legal-aid lawyer to the case for the purposes of the cassation proceedings.

and   DECIDES to close the examination of this case.

may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17-member Grand Chamber of the Court.

A constitutional complaint cannot be considered bound to fail because of the mere fact that the Federal Constitutional Court has ruled on the case before on the basis of a previous constitutional complaint

However, the present cases could be differentiated from the Pejřilová case in two respects.

In the case of Yevdokiya Kuznetsova v.

In the case of Gorše v.

In view of the true complexity of the case and the real involvement of counsel for those two interveners, the appropriate awards had been BGN 900 (EUR 460.16) for each, which came to three times the legal