CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

42 695 résultats pour « Alefeld »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126955

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2013

10 septembre 2013

The applicant alleged to have been ill-treated by the police and forced into confession.

Source officielle

Page 7 sur 2135

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13997

Admin. suprême

7 février 2023

7 février 2023

The issue in the case was the alleged adequacy of measures aimed at protecting in criminal proceedings the rights of a child victim of sexual abuse.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141618

Admin. suprême

3 février 2014

3 février 2014

    Alleged ill-treatment and criminal proceedings against the applicant On 14 May 2006 the applicant was stopped by the police officers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0921DEC006171716

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2021

21 septembre 2021

, seeking compensation for non-pecuniary damage in relation to being an accessory to her alleged rape.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5735

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2001

8 mars 2001

Hungary - 58073/00 Judgment 8.3.2001 [Section II] Article 3 Extradition Threatened extradition to China, with alleged risk of exposure to ill-treatment: struck out Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182817

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2018

13 avril 2018

The applicant’s criminal complaint was dismissed as ill-founded after his questioning and the questioning of the alleged offender.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12399

Admin. suprême

28 février 2019

28 février 2019

Romania (communicated case) - 44654/18   Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Alleged failure of State to address bullying at school of child with mental disorder: communicated Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12527

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2019

29 janvier 2019

Due to the applicants not having pointed to any circumstances justifying the lifting of the corporate veil, the Chamber found that they could not claim to be victims of the alleged violation stemming from

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-246031

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2025

14 octobre 2025

influence of alcohol at the time, she provided the police with a written reconstruction of the events, a map of the location, a chat conversation with a friend who called her immediately after the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231281

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2024

31 janvier 2024

The applicant lodged appeals against the said decision pointing to several alleged deficiencies of the investigation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-250181

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2026

21 avril 2026

Published on 11 May 2026   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 4200/25 A.I.L. against Romania lodged on 30 January 2025 communicated on 21 April 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520DEC001332002

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2008

20 mai 2008

    Alleged violation of Article 3 of the Convention 40.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0204DEC004268604

Admin. suprême

4 février 2014

4 février 2014

However, the applicant had not complained that the authorities had not referred to the other   21 alleged perpetrators. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019DEC007266516

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2021

19 octobre 2021

Russia, application no. 46889/18 The events of the alleged ill-treatment 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169416

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2016

10 novembre 2016

and Gad., two of the alleged perpetrators. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1201DEC001118210

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2015

1 décembre 2015

    In the present application, although the authorities had initiated, presumably of their own motion, a criminal investigation into the applicant’s alleged abduction and ill-treatment, the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-241959

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2025

23 janvier 2025

Under Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant complains of his alleged ill-treatment during his police custody (that is, alleged failure by the police to allow him to take his prescribed medicine, seizure

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC004402709

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2010

16 mars 2010

COMPLAINTS Relying on Article 5 of the Convention, the applicant complained about the length of his pre-trial detention and the alleged lack of an enforceable right to compensation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4098

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2004

2 novembre 2004

Spain - 58438/00 Judgment 2.11.2004 [Section IV] Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Alleged ill-treatment in police custody and effectiveness of the investigation: no violation, violation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188656

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2018

25 novembre 2018

He also alleged that the proceedings he was involved in were unfair and breached his rights guaranteed by Article 6 because (i) the courts lacked impartiality as they were composed of judges which were

Source officielle