CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

36 166 résultats pour « AmrouCnt »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209JUD002546620

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2025

9 décembre 2025

They later split the amount into two parts – BGN 63,623 (EUR 32,530 – hereinafter “the first amount”) and BGN 54,466 (EUR 27,848 – hereinafter “the second amount”) – and issued separate refusals for each

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177383

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2017

5 septembre 2017

Turkey lodged on 20 July 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application essentially concerns the financial loss suffered by the applicant as a result of the domestic courts’ refusal to update the amount

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182888

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2018

17 avril 2018

    On 30 November 2011, the police returned the impugned amount to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245293

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2025

8 septembre 2025

On 12 May 2015 company P. issued an invoice to the applicant company in which it indicated the amount of the VAT to be paid. On 26 May 2015 the applicant company paid that amount of VAT.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0404DEC004207322

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2024

4 avril 2024

    The Slovak Republic shall pay the applicant ... within one month from the conclusion of this Agreement the amount of EUR 227,888 ([this] amount [consists of] ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0530DEC004424916

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2024

30 mai 2024

The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120081

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2013

30 avril 2013

For that purpose, following the creditor’s enforcement petition, the applicant applied for a judicial authorisation of the enforcement of a total amount consisting of the adjudicated principal amount and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161837

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2016

10 mars 2016

On 6 November 2008 the applicant was released on bail for the amount of AMD 3,500,000 (approximately EUR 7,400).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD000869311

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2016

13 décembre 2016

By decision of 24   September 2009 the City Court granted A fees in the amount of DKK   183,862.50 (approximately EUR 24,700) plus VAT and reimbursement of costs in the amount of DKK 2,060 which

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0826DEC002975411

Admin. suprême

26 août 2014

26 août 2014

Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the Government’s declaration, as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases –

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5172

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2002

26 septembre 2002

The decision has become final but, despite the steps taken by the applicant, the authorities have not as yet paid the amounts owing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181496

Admin. suprême

16 février 2018

16 février 2018

The relevant law offers two options for calculating the amount of excise duty: by multiplying the volume of the tank in which the oil is found by one-hundred or by multiplying the amount of oil used for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120639

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2009

3 mars 2009

IM. on the Regulations for the Execution of Prison Sentences and Pre-trial Detention (“the Regulations”), inmates are obliged to contribute to the cost of their maintenance in prison in an amount set by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219368

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2022

2 septembre 2022

court decided to double the amount proposed by the expert due to a complicated healing of the incision and a further risk of complications.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150870

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2015

6 janvier 2015

He further requested the award of non-pecuniary damage in the amount of ALL 1,500,000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211DEC004216615

Admin. suprême

11 février 2020

11 février 2020

He also complained about the fact that no interest had been applied to the amount awarded by the domestic courts. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0806JUD004972511

Admin. suprême

6 août 2020

6 août 2020

It was also noted that the amount of interest due to the applicants would be determined in a separate set of proceedings. 14 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1211JUD003155603

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2008

11 décembre 2008

The applicant has been paid this amount. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1016DEC001082305

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2007

16 octobre 2007

He demanded a higher amount of pension for the periods both before and after 1 January 1992.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1107DEC004593599

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2000

7 novembre 2000

  The amount that shall be repaid is determined as a percentage of the income of the person liable for maintenance.

Source officielle

Page 7 sur 1809

← PrécédentSuivant →