xa0;  Recalling that the case originated in an application against Italy lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 8 January 1988 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Mr Joseph

:top } .sF615212F { width:18.72%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5E502762 { height:97.7pt }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 42451/20 Alfred Joseph

The applicant was allegedly informed in that respect that the trial date had not yet been set.

According to the accusation, the worker in question had not been equipped with any security equipment.

It first found that the applicant’s book-keeping had been so seriously flawed that the Tax Authority had been justified in making an assessment of arrears of the applicant’s tax returns for the relevant

However, the Court notes that the applicants have now been granted a residence permit in the Netherlands and that they are thus no longer at risk of being expelled.

DECISION Application no. 58877/09 by Rana Najib TOBIYA against the Netherlands and Greece The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 15 June 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep

If so, can the applicant claim to be a victim of the alleged violation of Article 6 in those proceedings, having regard to the fact that he has been acquitted?

It follows that the application has been introduced out of time and must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention.

the civil proceedings had been unreasonably lengthy.

The forensic works have been suspended since then. 23.

In connection with these activities she had been arrested, questioned and detained, in the course of which she had been ill-treated.

According to the ABP medical department, the applicant had not been incapable to file such a request.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention that he had been tortured in the Police Department on 26 September 2002 and that there had been no effective investigation into his

The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, in respect of one of the flats in the house situated on the street Unirii no. 2, that they had been deprived of their possessions.

The Court has not been informed of the outcome of these proceedings.

As a result, he had been arrested on suspicion of collaboration with Ethiopia and placed in a military prison.

The applicant also complained, invoking Articles 2 and 4 of Protocol No. 7 that she had been denied a right of appeal and that she had been punished twice.

THE LAW The Court notes that the applicants have now been granted residence permits in the Netherlands and appear not to intend to pursue their application.

} THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 2460/04 by Silvo TRATAR against Slovenia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 9   March 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep