Their applications were lodged with the Court on 18   February   2007 and 17   March   2009, respectively.

In Delta wing, he claims he shared a small cell with one other prisoner, with an open toilet that often failed to work, in hot, cramped conditions with little natural light and no ventilation.

    The applicant companies alleged that the revocation of their licences to operate amusement arcades with slot machines in Hungary amounted to an unjustified interference with their rights

Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application could be restored to the list in accordance with Article  

Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application could be restored to the list in accordance with Article  

DECISION Application no. 17182/10 by Andrzej SZCZEPAŃSKI against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 8   March   2011 as a Committee composed of:   Sverre Erik

Application no. 40464/08 Stoyan Dimitrov PELTEKOV and others against Bulgaria The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 12   January 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

Two of the applicants died after the lodging of the application with the Court and their heirs expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings in their stead.

The Court therefore considers that, by not divulging that information, the applicant failed to comply with her procedural obligations under Rule 44C § 1 of the Rules of Court.

In view of the above, the Court finds that the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§

In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§ &

    The letters sent to the first and third applicants were returned to the Registry with the postmark “non réclamé”.

DECISION Application no. 17170/10 by Tadeusz SARWA against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 8   March   2011 as a Committee composed of:   Sverre Erik

  36719/97), an Italian lawyer born in 1955 and living in Rosarno (Reggio de Calabre), who was charged with making a false accusation and ultimately acquitted.

SECTION DECISION Application no. 47057/09 by Robert GĄSIOR against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 8   March 2011 as a Committee composed of:   Sverre Erik

THE LAW On 16   December   2010 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I, Rafał Cygan, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay to me, with a view

In view of the above, the Court finds that the complaint under Article 6 of the Convention is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application could be restored to the list in accordance with Article  

Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application could be restored to the list in accordance with Article  

Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols