CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

127 résultats pour « GURARD Valentin »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD006280709

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2024

11 janvier 2024

main legal issues raised in the applications and that there is no need to rule separately on the remaining complaints (see Turbylev , cited above, §§ 92-97, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

Page 7 sur 7

← Précédent

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD000196714

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2016

22 novembre 2016

Sections 3 and 33 of the Hospitalisation Act in force at the time provided that, in cases where hospitalisation had been ordered, it was also necessary to guard against threats potentially posed by the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0619JUD005198019

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2025

19 juin 2025

above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case and that there is no need to examine the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511JUD007373117

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2021

11 mai 2021

2012 until 16 August 2017, the applicant had been sanctioned fifty-eight times, mostly on account of self-aggression, damage to property, hitting another inmate and being disrespectful to the prison guards

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0507JUD005337118

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2026

7 mai 2026

authorities: 1) the Minister of National Defence; 2) the Minister for Public Finances; 3) the Minister for Foreign Affairs; 4) the Chief Commander of the Police; 5) the Chief Commander of the Border Guard

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1007JUD000006220

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2025

7 octobre 2025

pursued the legitimate aims of preventing the sharing of unsubstantiated information, which could be damaging to the reputation of penal institutions and breach the presumption of innocence of prison guards

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD006519211

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2014

26 juin 2014

Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two French nationals, Mr Dominique Mennesson (“the first applicant”) and Ms Sylvie Mennesson (“the second applicant”), and two nationals of the United States of America, Ms Valentina

Source officielle