In December 2018 the Lugansk Garrison Military Prosecutor supervising the investigation of the case by the Lysychansk police department, reached a conclusion that the investigation carried out had been

By two decisions (of 20 April 2001 and 4 May 2001) the Military Court of Belgorod Garrison awarded the applicant 6,011 Russian Roubles, to be recovered from the Ministry of Defence.

On 20 July 2010 the Vyborg Garrison Military Court found the contested decision lawful.

    On 24   February 2014 the Military Court of the Moscow Garrison and on 26   June 2014 the appeal court upheld lawfulness of the above decision. 18.

On 11/11/2020 the applicant’s appeal against the refusal of 22/01/2019 was rejected by the Yaroslavl garrison military court; that decision was upheld on 09/02/2021 by the Second Western Circuit Military

order Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     40061/11 12/04/2011 Dmitriy Valentinovich Grebenichenko 20/02/1963 Moscow Garrison

    The applicants’ appeals against the termination of the criminal case On 28 January 2015 the applicants lodged an appeal against the aforementioned decision before the Grozny Garrison Military

firearms, ammunition, explosives, or explosive devices, if this has entailed their stealing or destruction or other grave consequences) and the case was transferred for investigation to the Chita garrison

    Criminal proceedings On 21 December 1987 the Kyiv Military Garrison Court acquitted Mr Z. of inflicting bodily injuries on the second applicant, holding that there was no corpus delicti .

On 1 October 1991, the YPA, Zagreb Garrison issued a decision granting the applicant the right to use and privatise a flat in Zagreb that was owned by the YPA.

By a decision of the YPA, Zagreb Garrison of 1 October 1991 the applicant was awarded another flat of 55 square metres with an option to purchase it.

As these entitlements went unpaid, the first and second applicant instituted proceedings in the Cherkassy Garrison Military Court against military unit A-0425 for their recovery.

    On 23 November 2001 the Chelyabinsk Garrison Military Court dismissed the applicant’s claims in full. The applicant appealed. 8.

    On an unspecified date in 2005 the Prosecutor of the Tambov Garrison instituted proceedings against the applicant before the Tambov Garrison Military Court, seeking annulment of the occupancy

  74814 in the Budennovsk military garrison. 22.

    On 20 January 2004 the SRJI wrote to the Grozny Garrison Military Court stating that they had not received the court’s letter of 1 December 2003 until 8 January 2004.

On 20 January 2004 the SRJI wrote to the Grozny Garrison Military Court stating that they had not received the court’s letter of 1 December 2003 until 8 January 2004.

    By the final judgment of 19 August 2004, the Military Court of Donetsk Garrison ordered the Donetsk Regional Enlistment Office to pay the applicant 1,144.07 Ukrainian hryvnias (UAH) [1] in

    On 12 May 2004 the Military Court of the Sochi Garrison allowed the applicant's claims against his former military unit and awarded him 215,245.76 Russian roubles (RUR, approximately 6,250

On 30/11/2021 the Rostov-on-Don Garrison Court dismissed the appeal against the refusal as unsubstantiated / This decision was upheld on 11/02/2022 by the Southern Military Circuit Court.