CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

26 267 résultats pour « Guilvy »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412JUD003438805

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2011

12 avril 2011

he has been proved guilty according to law.

Source officielle

Page 70 sur 1314

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146460

Admin. suprême

28 août 2014

28 août 2014

On the basis of statements by two policemen she found the applicant guilty of having taken part in a meeting conducted in breach of regulations and convicted the applicant under Article 20.2 of the Code

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC002028608

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2011

22 novembre 2011

Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.” 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0315DEC003857697

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2001

15 mars 2001

enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 will be violated if a decision given by a judge or by another public authority and concerning a person charged with a criminal offence reflects an opinion that he is guilty

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0309DEC003049396

Admin. suprême

9 mars 1999

9 mars 1999

    On 27 September 1984 the İstanbul Military Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to lifetime imprisonment.     The applicant appealed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-498

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2011

14 juin 2011

She verified the minutes of the proceedings and, noting that no mention had been made of the lawyer having been found guilty of contempt, ensured that the newspaper issued an apology.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-194143

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2019

28 mai 2019

The District Court’s decision of 9 June 2016 had established that she had been guilty of such offences but her detention had been no longer necessary “because she had already served her punishment”. 10

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182290

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2018

23 mars 2018

On 14 March 2013 the Piotrków Trybunalski District Court ( Sąd Rejonowy ) found inter alia the applicant guilty of defamation and discontinued the proceedings for a probationary term of one year.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206001

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2020

12 octobre 2020

On 27 December 2018 a justice of the peace of Court Circuit no. 174 of St Petersburg found T. guilty and sentenced him to 160 hours’ community service.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224157

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2023

17 mars 2023

In so far as the human trafficking charge was concerned, in finding the applicants guilty of trafficking six persons, the courts relied on the statements of six female employees originating from the Republic

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2847

Admin. suprême

22 février 2007

22 février 2007

The assize court found the applicant guilty by a majority and sentenced him to a suspended term of eight years and six months’ imprisonment. The applicant appealed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175018

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2017

7 juin 2017

As to the applicant’s request for release from detention, the Constitutional Court concluded that, since the applicant had in the meantime been found guilty as charged and sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC001874305

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

On 7 April 2003 the Pécs District Court, after holding thirteen hearings, found the applicant guilty as charged. The applicant appealed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156678

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2015

6 juillet 2015

On 19 July 2005 the Chertanovskiy District Court of Moscow found the applicant guilty of having assaulted a police officer and sentenced him to a year of imprisonment to be served in a colony-settlement

Source officielle
CA

CHAMBRE 8 SECTION 2

615e0df0c25a97f0381f5090

Appel

19 février 2015

19 février 2015

[Localité 2] - de nationalité Française demeurant : [Adresse 6] Comparant en personne, assisté de Me WERSTLER, avocat substituant Me FRANCHI, avocat au barreau de DOUAI et assisté de Me Guillaume GUILLUY

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163227

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2016

27 avril 2016

The applicant pleaded guilty to the charge. On 27 October 2015 the Ostankinskiy District Court found the applicant guilty as charged, fined him and issued a deportation order.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172767

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2017

14 mars 2017

Furthermore, it was noted that the applicant had two prior convictions: on 4 February 2013 he had been found guilty of disorderly conduct and sentenced to six months’ imprisonment, suspended for a year

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7292

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2012

20 novembre 2012

It subsequently found the applicant guilty of a serious disciplinary offence and reduced his annual salary by 70%.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0604DEC004568999

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2002

4 juin 2002

On 14 March 2000, the fourteenth applicant was found not guilty by a DCM of three offences of theft but pleaded guilty to a charge of absence without leave.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1010JUD004209598

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2000

10 octobre 2000

with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.” 40.

Source officielle