cutting his wrists.

the fields near his house.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

The applicant's son did not heed his request.

In the opinion of the Council of State, the applicant should have been considered as a civil servant on the day of the appointment and not on the day of his actually taking up his duties. 12.

He was unable to see his son since the time of his arrest due to ill-health and inability to travel long distances.

On 17 February 1990 his application was refused.

to inform the victim’s family of his absence from school and his death.

    On 7 June 2006 the applicant repeated his request concerning the payment of his dentures through monthly instalments. 24.

the seizure of his property (see paragraphs   58 and 59 above).

    Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his

Many perceived his killing as a direct attack on democracy.

On 10   April   1992 the Hungarian Pest Central District Court ordered his detention on remand until his extradition to Germany.

According to the applicant, the arrest was carried out in a brutal manner: police officers twisted his fingers, gave him several blows on his back and legs and put him face down against the floor of the

In 1999, a child was born from his marriage with a Czech national and, in 2016, his then partner gave birth to twins.

G.J. to confine his report to the Auschwitz concentration camp.

All this, in his submission, should disqualify Judge Stępkowski from dealing with his case. 21 .

His arms are stretched out in front of him and his fingers rest on the wall to support all of his body weight. The detainee is not allowed to reposition his hands or feet. [8.]

    The applicant complained under Article 6 and 8 of the Convention about the length of the proceedings regarding the determination of his contact rights in respect of his daughter. 52.

Referring to his complaint of 6 December 2005 (see paragraph 9 above), the applicant requested that a comprehensive investigation be carried out in respect of his allegations. 13 .