The applicants were represented by Mr A. Humlen, a lawyer practising in Oslo. The Norwegian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr M.

    In the instant case, save for her own assertions – which were apparently made for the first time in the proceedings before the Court and were not brought to the attention of any domestic

A fact-finding report prepared by the Iraqi Parliament stated that eighty-five shells were fired by the Turkish military on the border that evening. 6.

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

The reasons given by the domestic courts were not only relevant but sufficient for the purposes of Article 8 § 2.

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

    The applicants were represented by Ms T. Dedejska, a lawyer practising in Strumica. The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R.

Other charges concerning sexual offences were also brought against him.

At that moment, they were not subjected to torture and they confessed of their own volition.

The partisans were shot and killed. 26.

They finally mentioned that there were no reliable data that Mr M. had been alive when he entered the lake. On the contrary, there were data in support of the opposite conclusion. 19.

in the corridor, which were painted brown, were closed.

He and five others were subsequently committed for trial in the Milan Assize Court. 12.     The applicant faced four charges.

On the latter date the proceedings were stayed and the charges were sent back to the investigating authority to correct errors. 20.

The subsidiary proceedings were the applicant’s fresh request of 19   August 2001 for a State benefits on the basis of the court decision of 6   July 2001.

On 29 July 2002 the Conseil d’Etat , which had stayed proceedings pending the ruling of the Court of Justice, held that in so far as provisions were maintained which were more favourable to female civil

    The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 3.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.     On 27 August 2009 the application was communicated to the Government.

It adjourned the case because most of the witnesses were absent. 19 .     The next hearing took place on 18 January 2001.