CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0210JUD002417814
10 février 2022
    In the leading case of Korban v. Ukraine , no. 26744/16, §§ 158-81, 4   July 2019, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD001911220
15 avril 2021
    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920JUD007818112
20 septembre 2022
It noted, in particular, that the ConEC had “established during the recount of majoritarian PEC results that a large number of ballots initially counted in favour of [the] leading [candidate] were found
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0331JUD006345819
31 mars 2022
    In the leading cases of Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 161-65, 22 May 2012, and Khodorkovskiy v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0930JUD000914620
30 septembre 2021
    In the leading cases of Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 152-58, 22 May 2012, and Khodorkovskiy v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202JUD000435919
2 décembre 2021
    In the leading cases of Spahić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos. 20514/15 and 15 others, §§ 25-31, 14 November 2017, and Kunić and   Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD002829520
13 octobre 2022
    In the leading case of Dirdizov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1130JUD000072406
30 novembre 2017
The Court finds that, as in the leading judgment, the debtor enterprises in the instant cases did not enjoy sufficient institutional and operational independence from the authorities, and the State is
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD001112708
6 avril 2017
    In the leading case of Yevdokimov and Others, cited above, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205767
9 octobre 2020
Act I of 1925 entitled ‘An Act to make special temporary provisions respecting rent and conditions in re-letting immoveable urban property’ came into force while the lease in question was still running
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607JUD000676704
7 juin 2011
    The prohibition on leaving the country 17.     On 22   July 2002 the Sofia city prosecutor imposed a ban on the applicant’s leaving Bulgaria without permission. 18.
soc
6079b2079ba5988459c55415
29 mars 1973
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QU'IL EST FAIT GRIEF A L'ARRET ATTAQUE D'AVOIR DEBOUTE LELONG DE SA DEMANDE TENDANT A LA CONDAMNATION DU COMPTOIR FRANCAIS DE L'AZOTE, SON ANCIEN EMPLOYEUR, AU PAIEMENT DES
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:CO10095
14 février 2024
siège est [Adresse 2], a formé le pourvoi n° Q 22-12.544 contre l'arrêt rendu le 18 novembre 2021 par la cour d'appel de Rennes (4e chambre), dans le litige l'opposant à la société Credit agricole Leasing
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:CO10326
12 juin 2025
la société CM-CIC leasing solutions a formé un pourvoi incident eventuel contre le même arrêt. Le dossier a été communiqué au procureur général.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0915JUD000473706
15 septembre 2011
It reprimanded the District Prosecutor’s Office, in particular, for not having served the applicants with its decision of 8   April 2000 and not letting them access the inquiry materials.
Pôle 1 - Chambre 5
68709e417c3ffdb9560b0847
10 juillet 2025
CM-CIC LEASING SOLUTIONS [Adresse 3] [Adresse 14] [Localité 9] Représentée par la SCP GRAPPOTTE BENETREAU, avocats associés, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : K0111 Assistée de Me Marie-Line CHAUVEL
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0614JUD007461211
14 juin 2018
    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD005326718
7 juillet 2022
pay that amount within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending
5ème Chambre
DTA_2202355_20251217
17 décembre 2025
Par suite, la société HSBC Real Estate leasing France n’est pas fondée à solliciter un ajustement à la baisse de 50 %.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0601JUD003377796
1 juin 2004
Company, owned by J.M., leasing plot No. 28, lodged an appeal with the Minister of Town and Country Planning. On 9   November 1992 the Minister upheld the contested decision. The M.
Page 70 sur 1642