The applicants did not claim any pecuniary damage as regards the share of a plot of land which had also been forfeited from them, nor did they cite lost profit for having been prevented from

From 1990 to 1993, the applicant allegedly lost EUR   12,224 as a result of the difference between the rent she had to pay for another accommodation and the rent received from her tenant.

    The Government submitted that the applicant had lost her victim status as a result of the courts’ rulings in the proceedings initiated by her under Law No. 87. 13.

    They claimed another BGN 528,000, the equivalent of EUR   269,962, for lost profit for not being able to use the land from 2000 to   2011.

    The Government submitted that the applicant had lost his victim status as a result of being compensated in the civil proceedings.

In these circumstances, having regard to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, the Court finds that the applicants have lost interest in their application and no longer intend to pursue it before the Court

Although the reasons relied on by the courts to justify the applicant’s detention were initially relevant and sufficient, they lost that character as time passed.

    Against this background, the Court considers that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the application. The Court finds no reason to continue the examination of the case.

According to the applicant, his family lost CZK 4,158,970 (EUR 145,981). COMPLAINTS 1. Invoking Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the applicant alleges a violation of his property rights.

During the trial it emerged that certain evidence was unavailable because it had been lost or destroyed.

In these circumstances, the Court finds that the applicant has lost interest in his application and does not intend to pursue it within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides

The applicant had therefore suffered an excessive restriction of his right of access to a court when he lost his right to appeal because he had not complied with the warrant for his arrest.

It appears that the Regional Court had lost the case-file and on 20   August 1996 the applicant was requested to provide copies of all documents in order to reconstruct it.

  THE LAW   The Court notes that the applicant’s lawyer has lost contact with his client. It must be, therefore, assumed that the applicant does not intend to pursue her application.

  THE LAW   The Court notes that the applicant's lawyer has lost contact with his client. It must be, therefore, assumed that the applicant does not intend to pursue her application.

    THE LAW   The Court notes that the applicant's lawyer has lost contact with his client. It must, therefore, be assumed that the applicant does not intend to pursue her application.

Having lost his case at first instance in an action against M., a client, for the recovery of fees owed to him for certain non-contentious services performed in the context of foreclosure proceedings before

and merits had not been received by 31 May 2005, on 21 June 2005 the Registry advised the applicant by registered mail that his failure to respond might lead the Court to the conclusion that he had lost

In these circumstances, the Court finds that the applicant has lost interest in her application and does not intend to pursue it within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides