Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SCP Spinosi, avocat de la société Lamy liaisons, de la SCP Piwnica et Molinié, avocat de la société Info6tm et [Z] & Associés

Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseillère référendaire, les observations écrites de Me Bertrand, avocat de la société Intellectual Ventures II LLC, de la SCP Le Guerer, Bouniol-Brochier, Lassalle-Byhet

On the other hand, the appellate court adhered to the lower court’s decision that the child should continue living with the father because that was in line with the child’s wishes and because Konin was

Both courts accepted that the applicant had been persecuted because of his religion as well as his nationality.

       In March 1992 the applicant and his family became the objects of media attention in connection with a television election broadcast.

A.O. also submitted that in December 2011 she had left the United Kingdom because attempts to get back together with the applicant had failed and because she had felt threatened by the applicant’s aggressive

On 20   February 2001 the judgment became final.

This judgment became binding on an unspecified date in 1997. 7.

The questioning started some time after midnight because we were waiting for a defence lawyer.

All publicly-owned flats became the property of the municipalities in which they were situated. 13.

He requested the court to waive those fees because he had no sources of income and could not afford to pay.

On the latter date the proceedings were adjourned because the parties failed to attend.

By a decision of 23 June 2003 the investigation was stayed because of the applicant's illness.

As emerges from the content of your letter mentioned above, your client is not considered as displaced because her father is not a displaced person.

On 24 September 1984 the Ministry rejected his application and returned his documents because the applicant was a Jehovah’s Witness.

This request was rejected by the Constitutional Court on 9 October 1991, because the applicant could have asked for review of the planning scheme in building proceedings concerning the land at issue.

    No hearings were fixed between September 2000 and 17 October 2000 because the case file had been sent to the St.

    Background to the case In 1999, immediately after birth, the second applicant was placed in a State institution because of her biological mother’s poor living conditions.

  Because the proceedings were "non-contentious" (Außerstreitverfahren), and because there had not been a hearing on appeal, the applicant only became aware of the names of the judges on 9 February

not deactivated the main switch, this had not contributed to the death because the kneader had not come into operation and the girl had sustained lethal injuries because of the fall (see paragraph