CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1215DEC002495294
15 décembre 1998
Given the legislator's intention to counter the risk to society in such cases by the most stringent preventive measure, i.e. detention in prison, this is even more justifiable in the far more serious case
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC004331698
7 juin 2001
Having regard to the opinion of the psychologists, it considered that in the ongoing conflict between the parents, the daughter, who was emotionally attached to her mother, became more and more unfriendly
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD002655916
15 décembre 2022
2017 Ioan Daniel PICHIU 1982     Botoşani Prison 24/11/2016 to 09/12/2016 16 day(s)   Botoşani Prison 14/03/2017 to 16/03/2017 3 day(s)   Găeşti and Iaşi Prisons 23/12/2019 pending More
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1127JUD003098924
27 novembre 2025
to warm water, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities   5,500     33078/24 21/10/2024 Oleksandr Yuriyovych SHATSKYY 1976   Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 13/09/2019 pending More
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0130DEC003777722
30 janvier 2024
The perpetrator killed four and injured more than 20 persons before he was shot dead by the police.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1012JUD003361412
12 octobre 2017
More than 7 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 29 day(s).   " ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0314DEC003970698
14 mars 2000
Instance issued a non-jurisdiction decision and separated the proceedings against Captain Halil Uluyurt from those brought against the other co-accused on the ground inter alia that the charges were more
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131JUD005025299
31 janvier 2006
However, more than four years later, the Netherlands authorities had decided he should leave the country. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD000816107
12 janvier 2016
Moreover, the passport had been issued more than three years after the death sentence had been handed down.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0725JUD004975518
25 juillet 2024
of the same date was sent to the applicant by the Swedish Migration Agency ( Migrationsverket ), in English, informing him about the practical arrangement and referring him to its website to obtain more
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1687
24 février 2009
These tests had proved all the more necessary as a hepatologist had found that the disease was chronic and the virus was continuing to multiply.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1597
3 mars 2009
Law : The lack of appropriate medical treatment and, more generally, the detention of a sick person in inadequate conditions could, in principle, constitute treatment contrary to Article 3.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-81532
20 juin 2007
the measures to comply with the judgment in the case of Van Vlimmeren and Van Ilverenbeek against the Netherlands     Introductory case summary   The case concerns the excessive length (more
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68197-68665
31 juillet 2000
  The applicant submits that being charged and convicted for his participation in sexual acts with more than one other consenting adult male in the privacy of his own home constituted an interference
ECLI:CEDH:003-68208-68676
1 août 2000
; Jiří Barfuss, a Czech national, complained under Article 5 § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge) of the European Convention of Human Rights about the length of his detention on remand (more
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109595
11 janvier 2012
On 30 September 2005 the Koło District Court decided to impose a more lenient measure on the applicant, and set bail at 5,000 Polish zlotys (PLN). The bail had to be paid before 14 October 2005.
ECLI:CEDH:002-94
7 février 2012
the Public Finance Ministry, the applicant was dismissed on the basis of a provision of the Labour Code which made it possible to dismiss an employee if he or she was placed in pre-trial detention for more
ECLI:CEDH:001-183738
14 mai 2018
More specifically, did E.S.Y. request the rectification of the judgment following the decision of the Court of Cassation dated 26 May 2016? If so, what was the date of the final decision?   2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC004803311
25 septembre 2018
The applicant lodged his application with the Court on 13 July 2011 which is more than six months after the date on which that decision was served on him. 17.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12118
11 septembre 2018
The applicants, all close relatives of one or more of the victims, three of whom had been present in Batang Kali at the relevant time, complained that there had been a breach of the procedural obligation
Page 71 sur 7138
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.