AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0918DEC001350005
18 septembre 2007
18 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0918DEC005766800
18 septembre 2007
18 septembre 2007
By reference to Article 37 §§ 1(a), the Court considers that the case should be struck out of its list of cases.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0918DEC001858602
18 septembre 2007
18 septembre 2007
On unspecified dates each of the applicants, save the eleventh and twelfth, instituted separate civil proceedings in the Kupyanskyi Local Court against the Joint Stock Company “Kupyanskyi Liteinyi Zavod
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0918DEC007445401
18 septembre 2007
18 septembre 2007
Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should therefore no longer be applied and the application should be struck out of the list of cases, in accordance with said Article 37 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0918DEC000929504
18 septembre 2007
18 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0918DEC003981403
18 septembre 2007
18 septembre 2007
The civil proceedings On 1 March 2000 a joint stock company in Gdańsk dismissed 200 employees, including the applicant, of the enterprise MG Stal SA in Bialystok, which the company had bought two
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0918DEC000456704
18 septembre 2007
18 septembre 2007
Struck out of the list
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920DEC000334105
20 septembre 2007
20 septembre 2007
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920DEC000273305
20 septembre 2007
20 septembre 2007
Struck out of the list
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920DEC004454906
20 septembre 2007
20 septembre 2007
Struck out of the list
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920DEC004058502
20 septembre 2007
20 septembre 2007
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920DEC003709403
20 septembre 2007
20 septembre 2007
Struck out of the list
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC003012802
25 septembre 2007
25 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC001729604
25 septembre 2007
25 septembre 2007
Struck out of the list
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC000770905
25 septembre 2007
25 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC001414305
25 septembre 2007
25 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC002243403
25 septembre 2007
25 septembre 2007
Moreover, she has failed to respond to a registered letter dated 8 June 2007, warning her of the possibility that her case might be struck out of the Court’s list if she did not reply.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC001413405
25 septembre 2007
25 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC000767405
25 septembre 2007
25 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC001397805
25 septembre 2007
25 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officiellePage 71 sur 2292
SCP BENICHOU & STUCKER
14/06/2026
Voir →
Stucker, Nicolas
28/02/2026
Voir →
MAISON STÜCKER
21/12/2025
Voir →
STUCKER, Benjamin Philippe
18/08/2025
Voir →
STUCKERT IMMOBILIER
23/07/2025
Voir →