CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD006827314

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2020

22 décembre 2020

They argued that, under section 224 of the CPA, they should have been fined immediately as “others”.

Page 72 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD000698406

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

The process of invalidation of aggregated results in four constituencies by the CEC did not have sufficient legal grounds or an evidentiary basis, nor was the process transparent.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1026JUD000253913

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2017

26 octobre 2017

Some did not have bed linen, mattresses, sanitary facilities or heating.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1002JUD001531909

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2014

2 octobre 2014

The relevant High Court should therefore have given reasons for its impugned decision in that case. 41.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD003510906

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2011

18 octobre 2011

Admittedly, Article 131 of the Federal Constitution allows complaints to the Administrative Court only once the parties have exhausted appeals.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0601JUD002482714

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2023

1 juin 2023

Nowhere is it stated that the merchandise in question could not have been sold by the claimant at a higher price after it was returned by the law-enforcement authorities or that the claimant would have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1025JUD003325104

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2011

25 octobre 2011

The authorities acknowledged his arrest, but they have not provided any documentary evidence giving official trace of his whereabouts afterwards.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0425JUD003633710

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2013

25 avril 2013

Had the Municipal Court considered that they were not authorised to bring such a prosecution, it could not have proceeded with the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0213JUD000867515

Admin. suprême

13 février 2020

13 février 2020

Gates have been built into the fences at regular intervals to provide access between them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0222JUD007256210

Admin. suprême

22 février 2018

22 février 2018

, as nobody would have believed the journalists’ allegations if they had reported on the issue without broadcasting the images.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325DEC000236208

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2014

25 mars 2014

The authority should therefore have applied the rules for the use and processing of individual data under the Security Police Act ( Sicherheits ­ polizeigesetz ) and should have weighed up the private

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1009JUD003787304

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2014

9 octobre 2014

The individual was to have a firm guarantee of the confidentiality of the information imparted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000159806

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2012

17 janvier 2012

It was quite possible that immediately after F. had been placed with the “crisis foster family” in October   2001 the granting of visiting rights to the applicants might have been useful.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530DEC004614112

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2017

30 mai 2017

Italy (nos. 45867/07 and others, 21 December 2010), and argued that the sum awarded them by the domestic courts should have been paid promptly. THE LAW A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD000554805

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2014

13 novembre 2014

We reiterate that non-governmental organisations have no right to engage in religious activities.” 19.     On 3 October 2002 the Ministry sent a third written warning.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC004298709

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

It appears that he was arrested by the police almost immediately afterwards, as he had no legal right to remain in Estonia, nor did he have a valid travel document.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD003461602

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2012

10 mai 2012

At the same time, the domestic courts have never clarified the Central Bank’s responsibility, either direct or subsidiary, in respect of the applicants’ grievances.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0405JUD004016012

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2018

5 avril 2018

    Every individual shall have the right to have his cause heard. This comprises: a.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0129DEC001306302

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2008

29 janvier 2008

On 6 September 2004 the applicant’s daughter, Mrs Aleksandra Janicka, informed the Court’s Registry that the applicant had died.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0405JUD004055912

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2018

5 avril 2018

    The applicant was born in 1963 and currently lives in Alexandria (Egypt). 6.

Source officielle