CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

142 749 résultats pour « More CE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10357

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2015

27 janvier 2015

Thus, holding the applicant liable under that provision also in respect of acts committed before that date had not constituted retroactive application of more detrimental criminal law as prohibited by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105DEC003674019

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2020

5 novembre 2020

the domestic courts had relied on the existence of a reasonable suspicion of his involvement in aggravated and violent offences committed within an organised armed group in the period of time covering more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1475

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2009

2 juin 2009

She was re-admitted to hospital the same year and this time Dr B. performed a third blepharoplastry as well as more plastic surgery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123DEC002823619

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2023

23 novembre 2023

More specifically, on the question of excessive delay in civil proceedings, the Court has consistently held that, while an unreasonable delay in enforcing a binding judgment may be contrary to the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3821

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2005

16 juin 2005

The applicants maintained that the jury should have received more specific guidance on the level of damages to be awarded at first instance, and that compared to the Tolstoy Miloslavsky case, where a violation

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1533607-1604826

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2005

14 décembre 2005

  The applicants brought an action in damages in the Rome District Court, as they considered that Italy’s involvement in the relevant military operations had been more extensive than that of the other

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11990

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2018

26 juin 2018

The fact of having been subject to a conviction could in some cases be more important than the minor nature of the penalty imposed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6968

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2000

2 mai 2000

the applicants’ silence at the police interview could not sensibly be attributed to their having no answer or none that would stand up to cross-examination it should not draw an adverse inference was more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13137

Admin. suprême

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

Electronic communication between the administrative authorities and citizens might contribute to the aim of a more accessible and better functioning administration.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0624DEC004992099

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2003

24 juin 2003

It noted that the applicants could have claimed more, but since it was bound by their statement of claim, it could not award more than they had indicated there. They appealed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7466

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2013

16 avril 2013

The Court accepted that if convicted the applicant would have access to medical facilities and, more importantly, mental health services, regardless of which institution he was detained in.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5028

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2003

21 janvier 2003

Though children were often more vulnerable and more in need of protection than adults, this was not a general justification for different considerations when assessing eligibility for compensation for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11746

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2017

14 novembre 2017

assembly Unforeseeable conviction of membership of an illegal organisation: violation Facts – In 2007 the applicant was convicted of “membership” of an illegal armed organisation (the PKK) and sentenced to more

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-448951-449715

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2001

15 novembre 2001

Slovakia (application no. 48672/99) Violation Article 6 § 1 Eight Slovakian nationals complained about the excessive length of the proceedings (lasting more than 11 years and three months, of which the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-527

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2011

31 mai 2011

The first applicant further alleged that this legislative intervention had discriminated against him, as a claimant whose proceedings were not yet finalised, as opposed to others whose more favourable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6318

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2001

18 octobre 2001

The District Court ordered an expert psychological assessment of the child and asked the expert to indicate which of the parents was the more suitable to look after her.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2741625-3003201

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2009

26 mai 2009

He had been a builder and had paid social-security contributions for more than nineteen years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14436

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2025

28 janvier 2025

had been convicted of an act which constituted an offence under domestic criminal law, thus potentially engaging a different Convention right from that relied on by the applicant in the present case, more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249686

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2026

20 mars 2026

It noted that although a gastroenterologist who had seen the applicant in March 2025 had recommended that he be seen also by a urologist, that had not been arranged for more than six months ( разп.

Source officielle
TJ

JAF CAB 3

65ca49efc0f14416cde28acf

T. Judiciaire

23 janvier 2024

23 janvier 2024

Localité 9] (bénéficie d’une aide juridictionnelle TOTALE n°2022/003396 du 29 juillet 2022 accordée par le bureau d’aide juridictionnelle de [Localité 16] DE [Localité 14]) représenté par Me Arthur MORE

Source officielle

Page 72 sur 7138

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.