CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10357
27 janvier 2015
Thus, holding the applicant liable under that provision also in respect of acts committed before that date had not constituted retroactive application of more detrimental criminal law as prohibited by
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105DEC003674019
5 novembre 2020
the domestic courts had relied on the existence of a reasonable suspicion of his involvement in aggravated and violent offences committed within an organised armed group in the period of time covering more
ECLI:CEDH:002-1475
2 juin 2009
She was re-admitted to hospital the same year and this time Dr B. performed a third blepharoplastry as well as more plastic surgery.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123DEC002823619
23 novembre 2023
More specifically, on the question of excessive delay in civil proceedings, the Court has consistently held that, while an unreasonable delay in enforcing a binding judgment may be contrary to the Convention
ECLI:CEDH:002-3821
16 juin 2005
The applicants maintained that the jury should have received more specific guidance on the level of damages to be awarded at first instance, and that compared to the Tolstoy Miloslavsky case, where a violation
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1533607-1604826
14 décembre 2005
  The applicants brought an action in damages in the Rome District Court, as they considered that Italy’s involvement in the relevant military operations had been more extensive than that of the other
ECLI:CEDH:002-11990
26 juin 2018
The fact of having been subject to a conviction could in some cases be more important than the minor nature of the penalty imposed.
ECLI:CEDH:002-6968
2 mai 2000
the applicants’ silence at the police interview could not sensibly be attributed to their having no answer or none that would stand up to cross-examination it should not draw an adverse inference was more
ECLI:CEDH:002-13137
16 février 2021
Electronic communication between the administrative authorities and citizens might contribute to the aim of a more accessible and better functioning administration.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0624DEC004992099
24 juin 2003
It noted that the applicants could have claimed more, but since it was bound by their statement of claim, it could not award more than they had indicated there. They appealed.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7466
16 avril 2013
The Court accepted that if convicted the applicant would have access to medical facilities and, more importantly, mental health services, regardless of which institution he was detained in.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5028
21 janvier 2003
Though children were often more vulnerable and more in need of protection than adults, this was not a general justification for different considerations when assessing eligibility for compensation for
ECLI:CEDH:002-11746
14 novembre 2017
assembly Unforeseeable conviction of membership of an illegal organisation: violation Facts – In 2007 the applicant was convicted of “membership” of an illegal armed organisation (the PKK) and sentenced to more
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-448951-449715
15 novembre 2001
Slovakia (application no. 48672/99) Violation Article 6 § 1 Eight Slovakian nationals complained about the excessive length of the proceedings (lasting more than 11 years and three months, of which the
ECLI:CEDH:002-527
31 mai 2011
The first applicant further alleged that this legislative intervention had discriminated against him, as a claimant whose proceedings were not yet finalised, as opposed to others whose more favourable
ECLI:CEDH:002-6318
18 octobre 2001
The District Court ordered an expert psychological assessment of the child and asked the expert to indicate which of the parents was the more suitable to look after her.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2741625-3003201
26 mai 2009
He had been a builder and had paid social-security contributions for more than nineteen years.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14436
28 janvier 2025
had been convicted of an act which constituted an offence under domestic criminal law, thus potentially engaging a different Convention right from that relied on by the applicant in the present case, more
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249686
20 mars 2026
It noted that although a gastroenterologist who had seen the applicant in March 2025 had recommended that he be seen also by a urologist, that had not been arranged for more than six months ( разп.
JAF CAB 3
65ca49efc0f14416cde28acf
23 janvier 2024
Localité 9] (bénéficie d’une aide juridictionnelle TOTALE n°2022/003396 du 29 juillet 2022 accordée par le bureau d’aide juridictionnelle de [Localité 16] DE [Localité 14]) représenté par Me Arthur MORE
Page 72 sur 7138
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.