Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927DEC003378405
27 septembre 2007
27 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927DEC003030306
27 septembre 2007
27 septembre 2007
In a letter of 31 August 2007 the applicant confirmed that she had no objection to the present application being struck out of the Court’s list of cases.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927DEC000334204
27 septembre 2007
27 septembre 2007
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927DEC000042305
27 septembre 2007
27 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC003309903
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC004236804
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
It follows that it should be struck out of the list of cases under Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC004206504
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
In a letter of 12 July 2007, the Government commented that they saw no reason for maintaining the proceedings and likewise requested that the case be struck out.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC002982804
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC004488405
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC000755305
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009JUD005373800
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
Accordingly, the remainder of the application should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009DEC006814501
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
By reference to Article 37 §§ 1(a), the Court considers that the case should be struck out of its list of cases.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009DEC001245405
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
Struck out of the list
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009DEC003845603
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009DEC000075704
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009DEC002434402
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009DEC003273703
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
On 12 July 2007 the Government also informed the Court that the parties had signed a friendly settlement agreement along the above-mentioned lines and requested that the case be struck out of the list
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009JUD003955902
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
said Act the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland (“the Ministry”) was authorised to restrict fishing, inter alia , if this was deemed necessary in order to safeguard future fish stocks
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009JUD006862101
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
On 17 November 2000, the tribunal struck out his appeal. 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0226DEC001930104
26 février 2008
26 février 2008
Struck out of the list
Résumé IA — à vérifierPage 72 sur 2292
SCP BENICHOU & STUCKER
14/06/2026
Voir →
Stucker, Nicolas
28/02/2026
Voir →
MAISON STÜCKER
21/12/2025
Voir →
STUCKER, Benjamin Philippe
18/08/2025
Voir →
STUCKERT IMMOBILIER
23/07/2025
Voir →