It appears that in May 2006 the applicant gave a copy of his letter to his mother and asked her to send it to the Court.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

The defendant referred in his book to his own claims as well as citing numerous quotations from Polish and foreign publications.

service history and as to his previous convictions.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, TROISIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société anonyme d'habitations à loyer modéré des Vallées de l'Austreberthe

At the relevant time, the first applicant objected to the proposed power station on the ground that it would pollute his property and render it unusable.

to hear evidence from him under oath in respect of his debts.

He received no answer to his request. 16 .

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le huit février mil neuf cent quatre vingt quatorze, a rendu l'arrêt

constituted a violation of his rights. 20.

He further complained about the length of his pre-trial detention. 4.

On 27 April 1998 the Skopje Court of First Instance dismissed the applicant’s claim concerning his removal and rejected his claim related to the termination of his contract. 34.

its effect on his ability to pay.

brought on his behalf.

serve his prison sentence. 4.

child, despite his attempts.

He referred to his personal circumstances, in particular his age (he was 63 at that time). 8.

personality rights and his economic freedom.

The applicant had the right to cross-examine M. alone or through his representative. The fact that some co-accused had left the hearing did not render the production of evidence unlawful.