CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003465104
27 novembre 2007
    These allegations attracted considerable attention on both sides of the Irish border and became the subject of police investigation in both jurisdictions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212JUD002386502
12 décembre 2006
The decision to transfer the case was then served on these defendants and became final on 24 February 1994. 9.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1010DEC006193300
10 octobre 2006
As there was no appeal, the decision became final on 21 November 1998. On 8 May 2000 the Istanbul State Security Court ordered the applicant’s release pending trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0315JUD000856402
15 mars 2007
The judgment of 11 March 2001 was not appealed against and became final. 11 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0106DEC002408807
6 janvier 2011
The first-instance decision of 2   October 2000 thereby became final ( pravomoćna ).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326DEC004375612
26 mars 2019
  1114 owned so-far by the State had become the ownership of the Narew Commune ( Gmina ). Subsequently, the Narew Commune became listed as its owner in the local land and mortgage register. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013DEC000166002
13 octobre 2009
The remaining part of the District Court’s judgment became final. 2.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-580991-584603
2 juillet 2002
As a result, the applicant became the owner of the building retrospectively.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003464004
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106DEC005563112
6 novembre 2018
As no appeal was filed, the order became final and binding on 20   August 1999. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0322JUD000626702
22 mars 2005
The judgment became final and enforceable on the same date. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003457504
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208739
19 février 2021
In 2005 the conviction became spent, pursuant to legislation on the rehabilitation of offenders. In 2007 the first applicant began work through an employment agency.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:1996:63
26 février 1996
#Biogen Inc. v Smithkline Beecham Biologicals SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunal de commerce de Nivelles - Belgium.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127DEC001473816
27 novembre 2018
It became final on 7 March 2007. 6.     Soon thereafter the applicant received BAM 5,045 in that connection. 7 .
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1756
15 janvier 2009
Such a remedy should conform to the Convention principles as laid down notably in the instant judgment and be available within six months from the date on which the judgment became final.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314DEC002180608
14 mars 2017
    On 16 February 2011 the Court of Cassation upheld the first instance court’s judgment and it became final. COMPLAINTS 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1012DEC003779397
12 octobre 1999
On 17 December 1990 the decision as to the acquittal of Mesut Uygun became final, as the public prosecutor did not appeal against him.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003382796
9 septembre 1998
This judgment became final at the latest on 21 February 1996.
cr
6079a8c09ba5988459c4ece7
3 février 1976
L'ARTICLE 1382 DU CODE CIVIL, DE L'ARTICLE 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, DEFAUT ET CONTRADICTION DE MOTIFS, MANQUE DE BASE LEGALE, " EN CE QUE L'ARRET ATTAQUE, TOUT EN CONSTATANT QUE LA CHASSE A LA BECASSE
Page 75 sur 1474
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.