2016 33636/12 MARIA COLȚA 23/02/2016 26349/11 CRISTIANA-CRENGUȚA RADU ET 8 AUTRES REQUETES 03/12/2015 76773/13 NICOLETA VASILICA FIERARU 23/02/2016 57448/14 ADRIAN GRIGOROF 02/02/2016 64454/14 STERIAN GULI

Christian Germain Maurice Y... ... 29290 LANRIVOARE représenté par la SCP JEAN LOUP BOURGES & LUC BOURGES assisté de Me Brigitte AVELINE INTIMÉE : Madame Martine Z... épouse Y... ... 29820 GUILERS

Guille B... C..., demeurant ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 30 avril 1999 par la cour d'appel de Fort-de-France (Chambre civile), au profit : 1 / de M. A..., Léon Z..., 2 / de Mme Y...

Stating that his guilt was of a particular gravity, the court sentenced him to life imprisonment.   The court stated that it had jurisdiction over the case pursuant to Article   6 no.

He requested payment of 25,000.00 Dutch guilders.

The court noted that G.’s guilt was confirmed by the conclusions of forensic medical examinations and that G. had “honestly repented”.

Court found that the criminal courts concerned had dismissed the applicants’ claims for compensation on the sole ground that, when they were placed in detention, there had been serious evidence of their guilt

The applicant denied his guilt, complained to the investigator that he had been ill-treated and confessed under duress, and requested to conduct his forensic medical examination.

In principle, a final conviction offered a guarantee of legal certainty compared with other possible findings of guilt in relation to the person supposedly unfit to inherit; this was in society’s interests

In that connection it noted that, while the pending investigation had not made any findings as to the guilt of A. or B., the article had backed the version of events given by B., who had been interviewed

bankruptcy or at a time when he knew that bankruptcy could not be avoided to his creditor A W Vredeveld and his creditor A M Van Buringen in settlement and payment of his debts, an amount of 3000,- guilders

If the statute no longer applied as a result of extrinsic circumstances irrelevant to the issue of guilt, the criminal act had to be adjudicated under the former statute.

The court also ruled that the decisions confirming the applicant’s guilt raised “serious doubts as [the complainant’s] statements had been inconsistent … and the testimony of the anonymous witness M had

[Adresse 3] [Localité 5], dont le siège social est [Adresse 2] - [Localité 1], prise en la personne de son gérant en exercice y domicilié représentée par Me Alain GUIDI de l'ASSOCIATION BGDM ASSOCIATION

N° 2019/ Rôle N° RG 17/12243 - N° Portalis DBVB-V-B7B-BAZHK [W] [U] [V] [D] C/ L'AGENT JUDICIAIRE DE L'ETAT Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à :Me GUIDI

légaux [Adresse 6] [Adresse 6] [Localité 2] représentée par Me Alain FISSELIER la SCP FISSELIER et Associés, avocats au barreau de PARIS, toque : L0044, avocat postulant assistée de Me Valérie GUILIN

Délibéré après l'audience du 26 mars 2024, à laquelle siégeaient : - Mme Guidi, présidente - Mme Peton, première conseillère, - Mme Mosser, première conseillère.

Le rapport de Mme Guidi, présidente, a été entendu au cours de l'audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.