Once they had applied for this within the time-limit, they became entitled to a transitional allowance (the amount of which did not differ from that of the previously received allowance or pension) until

It was only after that threshold test had been met, and thus Article 3 was applicable, that the returning States’ obligations listed in the Paposhvili judgment became of relevance.

They pointed out that as the first-instance court’s judgment against him had become final, the applicant should have sought compensation before the domestic courts pursuant to Article 141 of the Code on

This judgment became binding on 11 March 2002 and was enforced on 27 October 2004. 6.

As the charges had been brought on 20 August 2009, that was, before the taxation proceedings had became final, there were no obstacles for examining the charge concerning aggravated tax fraud.

35 § 1 of the Convention to take the start of the six-month period from the date on which the applicant first became or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Keenan v. the United Kingdom

by a third party affected by the case within six months of the date he or she became aware of a violation of his or her rights. 20.

That judgment became final on 7 June 2017. 5.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Beecham Fragrances devenue Lancaster Group SA, dont le siège social

It became final and binding after being upheld on appeal and enforcement proceedings were instituted.

This judgment became final and was enforced on 13   October 1998. 14.

That judgment became final on 14 October 1999. 28.

Vu la procédure suivante : La société civile immobilière Sun Beam a demandé au juge des référés du tribunal administratif de Nice, sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative

This judgment became binding on 7   June 2004.

  In 2000, it became possible for the applicants to obtain compensation from the State.

It appears that the above decisions of the City Court were not appealed against and became final.

Application no. 75845/01)       JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   3 May 2007           FINAL     03/08/2007     This judgment will become

    In the case of Demir (cited above) the Court held that that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.

At the relevant time, such claims became time-barred after 30 years (section 195 of the Civil Code as in force until 31   December 2001).

    In the case of Şefik Demir (cited above) the Court held that that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.