CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164551
10 juin 2016
The court emphasised that each case would be fact-sensitive and would fall for consideration on its own merits.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0213JUD005140919
13 février 2025
The Court’s assessment (a)    General principles 30.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD005589400
13 juillet 2006
Pour le surplus, bien qu'ayant exprimé certains doutes à propos du fait que l'Office ne s'était pas interrogé avant le mois de septembre   1997 sur la possibilité de faire établir une expertise plus
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1108JUD006395019
8 novembre 2022
    In accordance with the principle of equality of arms, as one of the features of the wider concept of a fair trial, each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2232398-2392876
17 janvier 2008
    Principal facts   The applicant, Nikolai Ivanov Dodov, is a Bulgarian national who was born in 1961 and lives in Sofia.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0306DEC001307987
6 mars 1989
      (3) An attempt is punishable."
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0131JUD003347018
31 janvier 2023
THE FACTS 9.     The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1107JUD001269703
7 novembre 2006
As one of the conditions of good faith is lacking, the defendant cannot be considered to have acted in good faith and there is no need to examine the other aspects of good faith.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120JUD005572419
20 janvier 2022
    Accordingly, having regard that the applicant received a suspended sentence for an offence punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment (see paragraphs 10 and 16 above), the fact that in
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD002258115
25 février 2020
THE FACTS 1.     The first applicant (Mr Gushchin) was born in 1988 and lives in Khimki in the Moscow Region.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD001024709
18 octobre 2011
    The general principles 67.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C100485
22 mai 2019
où l'administration a confirmé le principe de l'exonération de plus-value ; que la Cour de cassation considère que constitue une faute pour le notaire le fait d'imposer son diktat sans informer un vendeur
ECLI:CEDH:001-208378
5 février 2021
The applicants defended themselves on the basis that this was a value judgment, a conclusion which they drew in good faith from the facts that resulted to them after having searched the website of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131JUD006401600
31 janvier 2006
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 13.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0705DEC000185422
5 juillet 2022
Holocaust, that he had not even mentioned or indirectly referred to the Holocaust, and that the Judenstern was not to be equated with the systematic extermination of Jews in Nazi Germany but was in fact
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0902DEC001992492
2 septembre 1992
  According to Section 63 (2) No. 1 of the Food Act a wrong indication is punishable only if it runs counter to the indications in the Austrian Food Regulations (Lebensmittelbuch).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD000649211
3 juillet 2012
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.     The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in Kyiv.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201JUD003401517
1 février 2024
(iii)    Necessary in a democratic society (α)      General principles 71.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1117DEC005672000
17 novembre 2005
Moreover, the courts had not properly established the facts and the files had been manipulated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0419JUD005017206
19 avril 2011
    The applicant appealed against the decision and drew the Court of Cassation's attention to the fact that he had not been convicted of any offence by the Istanbul Assize Court, which in fact
Page 77 sur 195