The case originated in two applications (nos. 32483/19 and 35049/19) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention

United Kingdom and D.S. v. the United Kingdom) on 12   April 1995 by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission") and on 3 May 1995 by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain

for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”), [1] by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) on 30 October 1999 and by the United Kingdom of Great Britain

However, that case concerned complaints under Article 10 of the Convention and the restriction imposed on the applicants on receiving information relating to abortion clinics operating lawfully in Britain

    The case originated in an application (no. 58559/09) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

    The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) on 9   July 1997 and by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern

    The case originated in an application (no. 41215/14) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

The case was referred to the Court on 12 October 1990 by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission") and by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ("the

    The case originated in an application (no. 22854/20) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the

Neil, acknowledged in the contempt proceedings that he knew of the Observer and Guardian injunctions and that he regarded "Spycatcher" as "banned in Britain", but he was satisfied with the legal advice

    The case originated in two applications (nos. 41516/10 and 75702/13) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention

  34356/06 and 40528/06) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

    The case originated in an application (no. 7552/09) against the United   Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged on 29   January 2009 with the Court under Article 34

The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ("the Government") also applied to refer the case to the Court on 27 August 1996 (see paragraph 6 below).

The case originated in an application (no. 8793/79) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, lodged with the Commission in 1979 by four British citizens, namely John Nigel Courtenay

xa0;  The case was referred to the Court on 8 December 1994 by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission") and on 23 December 1994 by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain

    The case originated in an application (no. 13378/05) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

Amongst other things, the statement points out that "in recent years several Western European countries, including the Federal Republic of Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands, France, Italy and Switzerland

    The case originated in an application (no. 35394/97) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”